Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Salesforce Exam Process-Automation Topic 5 Question 29 Discussion

Actual exam question for Salesforce's Salesforce Process Automation Accredited Professional Exam exam
Question #: 29
Topic #: 5
[All Salesforce Process Automation Accredited Professional Exam Questions]

If a record meets one criteria, an email should be sent. If the record meets a different criteria, a task should be created. It is possible that a record meets both criteria.

What is the recommended solution for this scenario?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

For a scenario where different actions (sending an email and creating a task) need to be taken based on different criteria, and a record could meet both, using a single Process in Process Builder is recommended. This allows for the evaluation of multiple criteria within one process and the execution of multiple actions based on those criteria, even if a record meets more than one set of criteria. Reference: Salesforce Help - Process Builder


Contribute your Thoughts:

Odette
2 months ago
It could, but it also ensures that each criteria is handled separately for better control.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leslee
3 months ago
But wouldn't having two separate Processes complicate the automation process?
upvoted 0 times
...
Levi
3 months ago
I prefer option D, defining two Processes using the Process Builder for more flexibility.
upvoted 0 times
...
Odette
3 months ago
I disagree, I believe creating one Workflow Rule with two Workflow Actions is the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leslee
3 months ago
I think the recommended solution is to create one Process using the Process Builder.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tijuana
3 months ago
Wait, you mean I can't just use a Voodoo doll to send the emails and create the tasks? Darn, Option C it is then.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jimmie
3 months ago
I'd go with Option D. Two Processes, baby! Double the fun, double the efficiency.
upvoted 0 times
Dominga
2 months ago
I'd go with Option D. Two Processes, baby! Double the fun, double the efficiency.
upvoted 0 times
...
Andra
2 months ago
D) Define two Processes using the Process Builder
upvoted 0 times
...
Olive
2 months ago
C) Create one Process using the Process Builder
upvoted 0 times
...
Walton
2 months ago
B) Create two Workflow Rules
upvoted 0 times
...
Elfrieda
2 months ago
A) Create one Workflow Rule with two Workflow Actions
upvoted 0 times
...
Marta
3 months ago
User 2
upvoted 0 times
...
Veda
3 months ago
User 1
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Tuyet
3 months ago
I see your point, Wilbert. I think having two separate workflow rules would make it easier to maintain and troubleshoot in the future.
upvoted 0 times
...
Wilbert
3 months ago
But what if the actions for each criteria are completely different? Wouldn't it be clearer to separate them with two workflow rules?
upvoted 0 times
...
Caitlin
4 months ago
Creating two Workflow Rules sounds like too much work. I'm going with Process Builder, it's the future!
upvoted 0 times
Silvana
3 months ago
If a record meets one criteria, an email should be sent. If the record meets a different criteria, a task should be created. It is possible that a record meets both criteria. What is the recommended solution for this scenario?
upvoted 0 times
...
Louann
3 months ago
If a record meets one criteria, an email should be sent. If the record meets a different criteria, a task should be created. It is possible that a record meets both criteria. What is the recommended solution for this scenario?
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Talia
4 months ago
Option C looks like the way to go. One Process Builder to rule them all!
upvoted 0 times
Stephane
3 months ago
Sounds like a plan. Let's go with that solution then.
upvoted 0 times
...
Chauncey
3 months ago
I think I'll go with option C and create one Process using the Process Builder.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cherilyn
3 months ago
That's a good point. It might be better to keep it simple with just one Process.
upvoted 0 times
...
Micah
3 months ago
I think having two Processes might create more complexity in the long run.
upvoted 0 times
...
Emerson
3 months ago
But wouldn't it be easier to manage if we had separate Processes for each criteria?
upvoted 0 times
...
Cyril
3 months ago
I agree, having one Process to handle both scenarios seems more efficient.
upvoted 0 times
...
Katlyn
3 months ago
Option C looks like the way to go. One Process Builder to rule them all!
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Dana
4 months ago
I disagree, I believe option A is more efficient because it can handle both criteria in a single workflow rule.
upvoted 0 times
...
Wilbert
4 months ago
I think option C is the best solution, as it allows for different actions based on different criteria.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77