Cyber Monday 2024! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Salesforce Exam Public Sector Solutions Topic 2 Question 24 Discussion

Actual exam question for Salesforce's Public Sector Solutions exam
Question #: 24
Topic #: 2
[All Public Sector Solutions Questions]

A government agency is currently using Business Rules Engine (BRE). Part of the current Prioritization matrix includes household income and household size. To correctly calculate the Households Area Median Income

(AMI) pool, the Expression Set needs to calculate the AMI and then evaluate the percentage against a predefined Federal Income Limit table to determine the prioritization pool.

To accomplish this, the BRE designer should include how many decision matrices?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

In the context of a government agency using the Business Rules Engine (BRE) to calculate and determine Households Area Median Income (AMI) prioritization using a matrix, the BRE designer should use two decision matrices (Option C). One matrix is necessary to calculate the AMI and to evaluate it against the federal income limits, which involves determining the percentage of AMI relative to these limits. The second matrix is then used to categorize these percentages into different prioritization pools. This allows for a clear separation of logic in handling the data: one matrix for the determination of AMI percentages and another for the allocation into prioritization pools based on these percentages.

Option A and D, which suggest using only one matrix, would not provide the necessary separation of calculations and evaluations for clarity and maintenance. Option B suggests using three matrices, which overcomplicates the process without clear necessity for three separate matrices when two are sufficient for the tasks at hand.


Contribute your Thoughts:

Quentin
4 months ago
If I had a dollar for every decision matrix in this question, I could probably afford to live in one of those high-priority households. But I digress - I'll go with C as well.
upvoted 0 times
...
Afton
4 months ago
Ah, the old 'too many cooks in the kitchen' scenario. I'm going with C - two matrices should be just enough to get the job done without going overboard.
upvoted 0 times
Cheryl
3 months ago
Yeah, let's not overcomplicate things with unnecessary decision matrices.
upvoted 0 times
...
Arlyne
3 months ago
Agreed, having two matrices should streamline the process.
upvoted 0 times
...
Colton
3 months ago
I think C is the way to go, keep it simple and efficient.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Maybelle
4 months ago
D seems like the easiest solution. Why overcomplicate it with multiple matrices when we can just have one that contains both the prioritization pools and the Federal Income Limits?
upvoted 0 times
...
Shenika
4 months ago
A bit of a tricky one, but I'm going with B. Three matrices - one for the prioritization pools, one for the household data, and one for the Federal Income Limits.
upvoted 0 times
Kristal
3 months ago
Definitely, having everything separated will make it easier to calculate the prioritization pool accurately.
upvoted 0 times
...
Emilio
3 months ago
It can be a bit confusing, but having three matrices will help keep the calculations organized.
upvoted 0 times
...
Santos
4 months ago
I agree, having separate matrices for percentages, household data, and Federal Income Limits makes sense.
upvoted 0 times
...
Omer
4 months ago
I think B is the correct answer. Three matrices are needed for this calculation.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Ty
4 months ago
I think the answer is B as well, it provides a more organized approach to calculating the prioritization pool.
upvoted 0 times
...
Anthony
4 months ago
I agree with Ellsworth, having separate matrices for percentages and income limits makes sense.
upvoted 0 times
...
Delpha
4 months ago
But wouldn't we need separate matrices for percentages and income limits?
upvoted 0 times
...
Alison
5 months ago
I think the correct answer is C. We need two decision matrices - one for the prioritization pool percentages and one for the Federal Income Limits to evaluate against.
upvoted 0 times
Antonio
4 months ago
Definitely, having separate matrices will help streamline the calculation process.
upvoted 0 times
...
Elroy
4 months ago
Yes, it's important to separate the percentages and the Federal Income Limits for accurate evaluation.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jimmie
4 months ago
I agree, having two decision matrices makes sense for this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Ellsworth
5 months ago
I disagree, I believe the answer is C.
upvoted 0 times
...
Delpha
5 months ago
I think the answer is B.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77