Cyber Monday 2024! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Salesforce Exam Sales Cloud Consultant Topic 1 Question 96 Discussion

Actual exam question for Salesforce's Sales Cloud Consultant exam
Question #: 96
Topic #: 1
[All Sales Cloud Consultant Questions]

Cloud Kicks (CK) is adding hundreds of new accounts to Sales Cloud daily. CK uses an automated process to assign Account owners. If no assignment can be made for an account, it will be routed to a specific user who will manually review and re-assign it at a later date. This user may have thousands of account records assigned.

Which solution should the consultant recommend when CK sets up the new account process?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

Adding the user to a separate role at the lowest level of the role hierarchy ensures that the manual reviewer does not inadvertently gain access to other users' accounts through role hierarchy-based sharing rules. This setup confines the user's access to only those records explicitly assigned to them, maintaining data security and ensuring proper access control.


Role Hierarchy Best Practices

Managing User Permissions

Contribute your Thoughts:

Christene
4 months ago
I'm gonna have to go with option C. Modify All Data is the way to go when you've got thousands of accounts to wrangle. Who needs role hierarchies when you can just press the 'Fix It' button, am I right? *wink wink*
upvoted 0 times
...
Jade
4 months ago
Option A sounds good to me. Placing the user in a separate role at the highest level ensures they have the necessary access without interfering with the rest of the team. Plus, it'll keep things tidy and under control.
upvoted 0 times
Joaquin
2 months ago
I see your point, but having that much access could lead to potential errors or security risks.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dexter
3 months ago
C) Assign the Modify All Data permission to the user.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kattie
3 months ago
That makes sense. It would give them the authority they need without causing any issues.
upvoted 0 times
...
Merissa
3 months ago
Option A does seem like the best choice. It provides the user with the access they need without causing any disruptions.
upvoted 0 times
...
Maryanne
3 months ago
A) Place the user in a separate role at the highest level of the role hierarchy.
upvoted 0 times
...
King
3 months ago
A) Place the user in a separate role at the highest level of the role hierarchy.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Tamie
4 months ago
I would go with option B, it makes more sense to me.
upvoted 0 times
...
Amie
5 months ago
I'd go with option B. Putting the user in a separate role at the lowest level of the hierarchy seems more secure and organized. Avoid giving that much power to a single user if possible, you know?
upvoted 0 times
Marion
3 months ago
C) Assign the Modify All Data permission to the user.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ora
4 months ago
I agree, option B seems like the best choice for security and organization.
upvoted 0 times
...
Loreen
4 months ago
B) Add the user to a separate role at the lowest level of the role hierarchy.
upvoted 0 times
...
Buck
4 months ago
A) Place the user in a separate role at the highest level of the role hierarchy.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Quinn
5 months ago
I disagree, I believe option C is more efficient.
upvoted 0 times
...
Reed
5 months ago
Hmm, I think option C is the way to go. Giving the user the Modify All Data permission will allow them to easily reassign those accounts. Feels a bit like overkill, but it gets the job done, am I right?
upvoted 0 times
Kate
4 months ago
C) Assign the Modify All Data permission to the user.
upvoted 0 times
...
Merilyn
4 months ago
A) Place the user in a separate role at the highest level of the role hierarchy.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Frank
5 months ago
I think option A is the best choice.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77