Cyber Monday 2024! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Salesforce Exam Salesforce Communications Cloud Topic 1 Question 22 Discussion

Actual exam question for Salesforce's Salesforce Communications Cloud exam
Question #: 22
Topic #: 1
[All Salesforce Communications Cloud Questions]

A company is selling voice products to business customers. The offer allows customers to select devices of various models. The product modeler intends to create a phone add-on product specification with voice offers with a cardinality that allows up to 700. Which of the three statement are valid regarding the product model in this scenario?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B, C, D

Contribute your Thoughts:

Gertude
2 months ago
This is a tricky one. I think I'll go with C, since EPC is supposed to natively support hierarchical modeling. But who knows, maybe the large cardinality will cause issues!
upvoted 0 times
Laurel
1 months ago
I agree with you, C seems like the safest option. Let's go with that.
upvoted 0 times
...
Vernice
1 months ago
I agree with you, C seems like the safest option here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Barbra
1 months ago
I'm leaning towards D. Decomposition might fail with a large number of products.
upvoted 0 times
...
Armanda
1 months ago
I'm leaning towards D. Decomposition might fail with too many products.
upvoted 0 times
...
Laine
2 months ago
I think C is the best choice. Hierarchical modeling is supported in EPC.
upvoted 0 times
...
Olive
2 months ago
I think C is the best choice. EPC supports hierarchical modeling.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Carin
2 months ago
Haha, option E sounds like the classic 'IT guy' solution - 'It's not supported, so just use a flat model!'. I'm going with B or D.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ahmad
2 months ago
I'd go with option D. Even though EPC supports hierarchical modeling, the decomposition might fail when dealing with such a large number of products.
upvoted 0 times
Vicky
1 months ago
Definitely, efficiency is key when it comes to processing operations.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cecilia
1 months ago
So, we should be cautious when dealing with large cardinalities in the product model.
upvoted 0 times
...
Elbert
1 months ago
I agree, the decomposition might fail with such a large number of products.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mari
2 months ago
Option D seems like the best choice here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Joesph
2 months ago
Yeah, option D is the most cautious approach. It's better to be safe than sorry when it comes to product modeling.
upvoted 0 times
...
Omer
2 months ago
I agree, option D is the safest bet. We don't want any failures during the processing of products.
upvoted 0 times
...
Oretha
2 months ago
Option D seems like the best choice here. It's important to consider the potential issues with decomposition when dealing with a large number of products.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Kanisha
3 months ago
Hmm, that's a good point. Maybe we should consider both options B and D when answering the question.
upvoted 0 times
...
Delbert
3 months ago
I disagree, I believe option D is correct because decomposition may fail with maximum products processed.
upvoted 0 times
...
Viola
3 months ago
Option B seems valid. Large cardinalities can definitely impact MACD operations. EPC should be able to handle this, but might face some performance issues.
upvoted 0 times
Fletcher
1 months ago
A) Since the product model uses OOTB feature of EPC, MACD operations and decomposition are guaranteed to work well
upvoted 0 times
...
Teddy
2 months ago
I agree, it's important to consider the potential impact on performance when dealing with large cardinalities.
upvoted 0 times
...
Justine
2 months ago
D) Product model uses OOTB features from EPC. Decomposition may fail when the maximum number of products is processed.
upvoted 0 times
...
Hoa
2 months ago
B) Modeling children with large cardinalities can result in processing inefficiencies for MACD operations.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Kanisha
3 months ago
I think option B is valid because large cardinalities can cause processing inefficiencies.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77