Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Salesforce Exam Salesforce-Data-Cloud Topic 1 Question 20 Discussion

Actual exam question for Salesforce's Salesforce Data Cloud Accredited Professional Exam exam
Question #: 20
Topic #: 1
[All Salesforce Data Cloud Accredited Professional Exam Questions]

What does the Source Sequence reconciliation rule do in Identity Resolution?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer

Contribute your Thoughts:

Mary
3 months ago
I'm gonna go with Option D. Identifying which records should be merged is the key to effective identity resolution, in my opinion.
upvoted 0 times
Mary
2 months ago
I see your point, but I still believe Option B is the best choice as it prioritizes the most recently updated data source.
upvoted 0 times
...
Svetlana
2 months ago
I think Option A is also important as it sets the priority of specific data sources when building attributes.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kristin
2 months ago
I agree, Option D is crucial for merging individual records into a unified profile.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Polly
3 months ago
Option A sounds good, but I'm not sure it's the full answer. Prioritizing data sources is important, but it's not the whole picture.
upvoted 0 times
Aliza
2 months ago
User 3: Maybe option D is the correct answer since it mentions merging individual records into a unified profile.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tu
2 months ago
User 2: I agree, prioritizing data sources is key, but there's more to it than just that.
upvoted 0 times
...
Angelyn
3 months ago
User 1: I think option A is on the right track, but it might not be the complete answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Esteban
3 months ago
I see where you're coming from. It's definitely between B and D for me too.
upvoted 0 times
...
Glory
3 months ago
B because it’s about prioritizing the most recently updated data source.
upvoted 0 times
...
Janna
3 months ago
Why B? I thought D was more accurate.
upvoted 0 times
...
Van
3 months ago
Haha, Option C is hilarious! Alphanumerically sequenced data sources? I don't think that's how identity resolution works!
upvoted 0 times
...
Laurene
3 months ago
I think Option B is the correct answer. It's all about identifying the most recently updated data source and prioritizing that in the reconciliation process.
upvoted 0 times
Marg
2 months ago
I'm leaning towards Option A. Setting the priority of specific data sources when building attributes in a unified profile.
upvoted 0 times
...
Emilio
2 months ago
I think Option D could also be a possibility. Setting a priority for specific data sources to merge records.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lashawn
3 months ago
I agree, Option B makes sense. It's important to prioritize the most recent data source.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Silvana
3 months ago
Option D makes the most sense to me. It's all about prioritizing data sources to determine which records should be merged into a unified profile.
upvoted 0 times
Novella
2 months ago
Yes, setting a priority for specific data sources helps determine which individual records should be merged into a unified profile.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lettie
2 months ago
I agree, option D is the most logical choice for the Source Sequence reconciliation rule.
upvoted 0 times
...
Johnetta
2 months ago
Yes, setting a priority for specific data sources helps determine which records should be merged into a unified profile.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rhea
3 months ago
I agree, option D is the most logical choice for the Source Sequence reconciliation rule.
upvoted 0 times
...
Fanny
3 months ago
Yes, setting a priority for specific data sources is crucial for accurate reconciliation in Identity Resolution.
upvoted 0 times
...
Titus
3 months ago
I agree, option D is the most logical choice. It helps in merging individual records into a unified profile based on the priority of data sources.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Glory
3 months ago
Yeah, I think option B makes the most sense.
upvoted 0 times
...
Esteban
4 months ago
It's a bit tricky, isn't it?
upvoted 0 times
...
Elizabeth
4 months ago
What do you think about the Source Sequence reconciliation rule question?
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77