Cyber Monday 2024! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Salesforce Exam Salesforce MuleSoft Developer I Topic 9 Question 18 Discussion

Actual exam question for Salesforce's Salesforce MuleSoft Developer I exam
Question #: 18
Topic #: 9
[All Salesforce MuleSoft Developer I Questions]

An organization is beginning to follow Mulesoft's recommended API led connectivity approach to use modern API to support the development and lifecycle of the integration solutions and to close the IT delivery gap.

What distinguishes between how modern API's are organized in a MuleSoft recommended API-led connectivity approach as compared to other common enterprise integration solutions?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

Correct answer is The API interfaces are specified at a granularity intended for developers to consume specific aspect of integration processes


Contribute your Thoughts:

Paul
2 months ago
Haha, Jules's 'Integrate All the Things!' approach sounds a lot like the old school enterprise integration solutions they're trying to move away from. Good call on Option B!
upvoted 0 times
...
Jules
2 months ago
Wait, does this mean I can't use my 'Integrate All the Things!' approach anymore? Darn it!
upvoted 0 times
...
Annice
2 months ago
Options C and D also sound like they could be correct, but Option B really captures the essence of the 'API-led connectivity' approach.
upvoted 0 times
Pearly
22 days ago
Yes, having APIs specified at a granular level for developers to consume is crucial in the API-led connectivity approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rosamond
25 days ago
Options C and D are important too, but Option B really focuses on the granularity for developers to consume specific aspects of integration processes.
upvoted 0 times
...
Arminda
2 months ago
I agree, Option B seems to be the key difference in how modern APIs are organized in a MuleSoft recommended API-led connectivity approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Jerrod
2 months ago
I believe that having API implementations built with standards and centralized configuration management tools is also crucial for ensuring consistency and efficiency in the integration solutions.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lynda
2 months ago
I agree with Art, having APIs specified at a granular level makes it easier for developers to work with and understand.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tarra
3 months ago
I agree with Harrison. Option B is the best answer as it aligns with the MuleSoft recommended approach of providing APIs that target specific integration needs.
upvoted 0 times
...
Harrison
3 months ago
Option B seems like the most logical choice here. Modern APIs should be designed at a granular level to allow developers to easily consume specific aspects of the integration processes.
upvoted 0 times
Luisa
1 months ago
Merilyn: And it aligns well with the API-led connectivity approach recommended by MuleSoft.
upvoted 0 times
...
Merilyn
1 months ago
Definitely, it allows for more flexibility and reusability in the integration processes.
upvoted 0 times
...
Owen
2 months ago
I agree, option B makes sense. Granular APIs are easier for developers to work with.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Art
3 months ago
I think the key difference is that API interfaces are specified at a granularity intended for developers to consume specific aspect of integration processes.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77