Cyber Monday 2024! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Salesforce Exam Salesforce MuleSoft Developer II Topic 2 Question 10 Discussion

Actual exam question for Salesforce's Salesforce MuleSoft Developer II exam
Question #: 10
Topic #: 2
[All Salesforce MuleSoft Developer II Questions]

Two APIs are deployed to a two-node on-prem cluster. Due to a requirements change, the two APIs must communicate to exchange data asynchronously.

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer

Contribute your Thoughts:

Janey
4 months ago
I'm pretty sure the correct answer is option A. The VM Connector is designed for exactly this kind of inter-application communication scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alyssa
4 months ago
Haha, this question is a real head-scratcher! I'm going to go with option B just to mess with the graders.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leota
4 months ago
Option C is the way to go. Instead of using the VM Connector, we should use a direct flow-ref to enable the communication between the APIs.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rikki
4 months ago
Option D seems more plausible to me. The APIs are running in a cluster mode, and each node has its own set of VM Queues, so the VM Connector can't be used.
upvoted 0 times
Socorro
3 months ago
Yes, you're right. Using the VM Connector in this scenario would not work due to the separate VM Queues for each node in the cluster.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kris
3 months ago
Option D seems more plausible to me. The APIs are running in a cluster mode, and each node has its own set of VM Queues, so the VM Connector can't be used.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Whitley
4 months ago
I'm not sure, but option D makes sense since each mode has its own set of VM Queues.
upvoted 0 times
...
Verona
4 months ago
I think option A is correct. The VM Connector can be used to enable communication between the two APIs since they are on the same domain.
upvoted 0 times
Shoshana
3 months ago
It seems like the decision depends on the specific requirements of the APIs and their communication needs.
upvoted 0 times
...
Toi
3 months ago
Option C suggests using directly instead of the VM Connector.
upvoted 0 times
...
Renato
3 months ago
But what if the VM Connector is not suitable for inter-application communication?
upvoted 0 times
...
Huey
4 months ago
I think option A is correct. The VM Connector can be used to enable communication between the two APIs since they are on the same domain.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Shayne
5 months ago
I disagree, I believe option C is better as it directly references the flow.
upvoted 0 times
...
Skye
5 months ago
I think option A is the best choice because the APIs are in the same domain.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77