Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location PL
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Salesforce Exam Salesforce-Net-Zero-Cloud Topic 1 Question 30 Discussion

Actual exam question for Salesforce's Salesforce Net Zero Cloud Accredited Professional Exam exam
Question #: 30
Topic #: 1
[All Salesforce Net Zero Cloud Accredited Professional Exam Questions]

What are two risks in not tracking and reporting greenhouse gases? (2)

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B, D

by Stephaine at Jul 04, 2024, 03:51 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium Salesforce-Net-Zero-Cloud Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel
Tyisha
1 months ago
As an environmental scientist, I can tell you that the risks of not tracking greenhouse gases are no laughing matter. A and B for sure, and maybe D too. Gotta take this stuff seriously.
upvoted 0 times
Alease
2 days ago
Customers are becoming more conscious of environmental impact.
upvoted 0 times
...
Amber
8 days ago
I agree, investors don't want to take unnecessary risks.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Diego
2 months ago
Haha, C is just random. Product sales blocked in Canada? That's a bit of a stretch. I'm going with A and B.
upvoted 0 times
Sylvia
1 days ago
Yeah, I think investors and customers are the main concerns when it comes to not tracking greenhouse gases.
upvoted 0 times
...
Micaela
6 days ago
I agree, C does seem unlikely. A and B are definitely more realistic risks.
upvoted 0 times
...
Troy
9 days ago
It's better to be safe than sorry, especially when it comes to potential risks for the environment.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nathalie
12 days ago
Yeah, I think investors and customers are the main concerns when it comes to not tracking greenhouse gases.
upvoted 0 times
...
Elliott
1 months ago
I agree, C does seem unlikely. A and B are definitely more realistic risks.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Eva
2 months ago
And losing contracts with companies tracking emissions could hurt sales.
upvoted 0 times
...
Slyvia
2 months ago
D is also a good option. Lots of companies are tracking their scope 2 emissions these days, so not reporting your own could cost you some lucrative contracts.
upvoted 0 times
Gwenn
1 months ago
D) Loss of contracts with companies tracking scope 2 emissions
upvoted 0 times
...
Lavonda
1 months ago
A) Investors may view non-reporting stocks and companies as riskier
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Marcelle
2 months ago
Customers might go for products from companies that are more environmentally friendly.
upvoted 0 times
...
Silva
2 months ago
I think A and B are the clear risks here. Investors and customers are increasingly focused on sustainability, so not reporting greenhouse gases could really hurt a company's reputation and bottom line.
upvoted 0 times
Tamera
20 days ago
Losing contracts with companies tracking emissions could really impact a company's revenue.
upvoted 0 times
...
Elly
22 days ago
That's true, companies need to be transparent about their environmental impact to stay competitive.
upvoted 0 times
...
Aide
27 days ago
Customers might also choose products from companies that are more environmentally friendly.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mary
1 months ago
User 2
upvoted 0 times
...
Keith
1 months ago
User 1
upvoted 0 times
...
Keena
2 months ago
I agree, not reporting greenhouse gases could definitely make investors see a company as riskier.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Jonell
2 months ago
Yeah, investors may see non-reporting companies as riskier investments.
upvoted 0 times
...
Regenia
3 months ago
I think not tracking and reporting greenhouse gases can be risky.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77