Salesforce Exam Salesforce Net Zero Cloud Topic 3 Question 36 Discussion

Actual exam question for Salesforce's Salesforce Net Zero Cloud exam

Question #: 36
Topic #: 3

[All Salesforce Net Zero Cloud Questions]

What are two risks in not tracking and reporting greenhouse gases? (2)

AInvestors may view non-reporting stocks and companies as riskier

BCustomers may choose alternative products that are perceived as better for the environment

CProduct sales may be blocked in Canada

DLoss of contracts with companies tracking scope 2 emissions

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: B, D

by Timothy at Sep 14, 2024, 12:34 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium Salesforce Net Zero Cloud Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Iola

2 months ago

A and B for sure. Although I'm curious if C involves some sort of maple syrup embargo. *winks*

upvoted 0 times

...

Gianna

2 months ago

D is obviously the correct answer. Loss of contracts? That's the real risk companies should be worried about. *chuckles* Unless they're planning to go 'off the grid' completely.

upvoted 0 times

Agustin

29 days ago

Definitely, it's important for companies to track and report their greenhouse gases to avoid losing contracts.

upvoted 0 times

...

Lauran

1 months ago

Yeah, it could really impact a company's bottom line.

upvoted 0 times

...

Scarlet

1 months ago

I agree, losing contracts with companies tracking emissions is a big risk.

upvoted 0 times

...

Timmy

2 months ago

This seems like a no-brainer. Who cares about Canada? A and B are the clear winners here.

upvoted 0 times

...

Dacia

2 months ago

I agree, A and B are the key points. Not reporting emissions could seriously hurt a company's reputation and bottom line.

upvoted 0 times

Denise

1 months ago

I agree, A and B are the key points. Not reporting emissions could seriously hurt a company's reputation and bottom line.

upvoted 0 times

...

Valentine

1 months ago

B) Customers may choose alternative products that are perceived as better for the environment

upvoted 0 times

...

Leota

2 months ago

A) Investors may view non-reporting stocks and companies as riskier

upvoted 0 times

...

Lashonda

2 months ago

And we could lose contracts with companies that track emissions. That's a big risk.

upvoted 0 times

...

Tenesha

3 months ago

Yeah, I agree. Customers might go for products that are seen as more environmentally friendly.

upvoted 0 times

...

Lynelle

3 months ago

I think not tracking greenhouse gases can make investors see us as riskier.

upvoted 0 times

...

Vilma

3 months ago

A and B seem like the most significant risks. Investors and customers are really driving the push for environmental accountability these days.

upvoted 0 times

Oneida

2 months ago

Definitely, not tracking and reporting greenhouse gases can have serious consequences for a company's reputation and bottom line.

upvoted 0 times

...

Alaine

2 months ago

Customers are also more likely to support companies that are transparent about their environmental practices.

upvoted 0 times

...

Eun

2 months ago

Yes, it's important for companies to track and report their greenhouse gas emissions to maintain investor confidence.

upvoted 0 times

...

Annice

2 months ago

I agree, investors are becoming more conscious of companies' environmental impact.

upvoted 0 times

...