Cyber Monday 2024! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Salesforce Exam Sharing and Visibility Architect Topic 2 Question 48 Discussion

Actual exam question for Salesforce's Sharing and Visibility Architect exam
Question #: 48
Topic #: 2
[All Sharing and Visibility Architect Questions]

Universal Containers uses Standard WorkOrder object to track various work orders sent to field agents. Currently, the WorkOrder object has more than 400 fields. There are eight different types of work order processes established. The Director of Customer Service wants to ensure that field agents gets to see only required information specific to the WorkOrder type they are addressing.

Which option is recommended to implement this requirement?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

Contribute your Thoughts:

Emilio
2 months ago
Option A? Seriously? Who wants to deal with custom LWCs when you can just use out-of-the-box features? *rolls eyes*
upvoted 0 times
Kimberlie
1 months ago
C) Use Dynamic form to add different page sections and control visibility of sections by Work Order RecordType value
upvoted 0 times
...
Franklyn
1 months ago
B) Use different page layouts per work order type with different sections representing key information about the specific work order type.
upvoted 0 times
...
Erasmo
2 months ago
A) Use a custom LWC to override the view action of WorkOrder with custom metadata type defining relevant fields per WorkOrder type
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Virgie
2 months ago
B or C both seem like viable options. I'm leaning towards C - the Dynamic form approach has a certain je ne sais quoi, you know?
upvoted 0 times
...
Anthony
2 months ago
Hmm, using a custom LWC to override the view action? Sounds a bit complex. I'd stick with the simpler options like B or C.
upvoted 0 times
...
Pearlene
2 months ago
I like the idea of using Dynamic form to control the visibility of sections based on the Work Order RecordType. That's a smart and flexible solution.
upvoted 0 times
Evangelina
2 months ago
C) Use Dynamic form to add different page sections and control visibility of sections by Work Order RecordType value
upvoted 0 times
...
Miesha
2 months ago
B) Use different page layouts per work order type with different sections representing key information about the specific work order type.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jacquline
2 months ago
A) Use a custom LWC to override the view action of WorkOrder with custom metadata type defining relevant fields per WorkOrder type
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Naomi
2 months ago
I personally prefer option B as it simplifies the process by using different page layouts per work order type.
upvoted 0 times
...
Emily
2 months ago
Option B is the way to go. Leveraging different page layouts per work order type is a clean and straightforward approach.
upvoted 0 times
Stanford
26 days ago
Dynamic forms could be useful too, allowing for more flexibility in controlling visibility based on Work Order RecordType value.
upvoted 0 times
...
Arlene
29 days ago
Using custom LWC with custom metadata type could also work well to define relevant fields per work order type.
upvoted 0 times
...
Felix
2 months ago
I agree, it would make it easier for field agents to focus on the relevant information for each work order type.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kanisha
2 months ago
Option B is the way to go. Leveraging different page layouts per work order type is a clean and straightforward approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Ashton
3 months ago
I disagree, I believe option C is more efficient as it dynamically controls visibility based on RecordType value.
upvoted 0 times
...
Berry
3 months ago
I think option A is the best choice because it allows for customization based on WorkOrder type.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77