Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Salesforce Exam Sharing-and-Visibility-Architect Topic 4 Question 43 Discussion

Actual exam question for Salesforce's Salesforce Certified Sharing and Visibility Architect exam
Question #: 43
Topic #: 4
[All Salesforce Certified Sharing and Visibility Architect Questions]

Universal Containers uses Person Accounts to represent retail customers and Business Accounts to represent commercial customers. The retail sales team should not have access to commercial customers but should have access to ALL retail customers.

With the organization-wide default on Account set to Private, how should the architect meet these requirements?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

Contribute your Thoughts:

Kaycee
6 days ago
I disagree, I believe option C is more appropriate. Creating a criteria-based sharing rule for Retail Sales role to access Person Accounts seems like a better solution.
upvoted 0 times
...
Princess
11 days ago
I think option B is the best choice. Updating the Retail Sales profile to grant access to Person Account record type makes sense.
upvoted 0 times
...
Fannie
12 days ago
Option C is the winner here. Keeps things organized and secure. Plus, who doesn't love a good criteria-based sharing rule? It's like the icing on the cake of Salesforce admin life.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shaunna
13 days ago
I think option B is the way to go, updating the Retail Sales profile to grant access to Person Account record type seems like the simplest solution.
upvoted 0 times
...
Xochitl
14 days ago
Wait, so the Retail Sales team can't access the Business Accounts? That's like a baker not being able to touch the bread, what's the point?
upvoted 0 times
...
Peggie
24 days ago
I like Option B. Updating the Retail Sales profile to include access to the Person Account record type is a simple and straightforward approach.
upvoted 0 times
Lachelle
7 days ago
I agree, Option B is the most straightforward way to meet the requirements.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lavonda
16 days ago
Option B sounds like the best solution. It's a simple update to the profile.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Gwenn
1 months ago
I'm not sure about option A, I think option C could also work by giving the Retail Sales role access to PersonAccount type.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rodney
1 months ago
Option C seems like the way to go. A criteria-based sharing rule is the cleanest solution to grant the Retail Sales team access to Person Accounts without exposing the Business Accounts.
upvoted 0 times
Lorrine
12 days ago
Creating a criteria-based sharing rule for the Retail Sales role to access Person Accounts is the most efficient way to meet the requirements.
upvoted 0 times
...
Juan
17 days ago
I agree, a criteria-based sharing rule is a targeted approach to ensure only the necessary accounts are accessible to the Retail Sales team.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lourdes
20 days ago
Option C is definitely the best choice. It allows us to specifically grant access to Person Accounts for the Retail Sales team.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Joesph
1 months ago
I agree with Zona, option A seems like the most logical solution to meet the requirements.
upvoted 0 times
...
Zona
1 months ago
I think option A is the best choice because it grants access to all account contact roles owned by retail sales reps.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77