Cyber Monday 2024! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location PL
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Salesforce Exam Sharing and Visibility Architect Topic 4 Question 50 Discussion

Actual exam question for Salesforce's Sharing and Visibility Architect exam
Question #: 50
Topic #: 4
[All Sharing and Visibility Architect Questions]

Universal Containers (UC) operates worldwide, with offices in more than 100 regions in 10 different countries, and has established a very complex Role Hierarchy to control data visibility. In the new fiscal year, UC is planning to reorganize the roles and reassign account owners.

Which feature should an architect recommend to avoid problems with this operation?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

by Mitsue at Sep 17, 2024, 08:52 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium Sharing and Visibility Architect Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel
Giovanna
2 months ago
Partition data using Divisions, hands down. It's the only option that really addresses the complex role hierarchy and data visibility issues.
upvoted 0 times
Richelle
24 days ago
Partition data using Divisions, hands down. It's the only option that really addresses the complex role hierarchy and data visibility issues.
upvoted 0 times
...
Latosha
26 days ago
C) Deferred Sharing Recalculation
upvoted 0 times
...
Willetta
1 months ago
B) Partition data using Divisions
upvoted 0 times
...
Benedict
1 months ago
A) Skinny table
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Katina
2 months ago
Skinny table? What is this, a diet plan for my database? I think we need something a little more robust here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dona
2 months ago
Deferred Sharing Recalculation, because who doesn't love a little bit of procrastination in their data management?
upvoted 0 times
Jerilyn
1 months ago
C) Deferred Sharing Recalculation
upvoted 0 times
...
Nida
1 months ago
B) Partition data using Divisions
upvoted 0 times
...
Eura
1 months ago
A) Skinny table
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Hyman
2 months ago
I see both points, but I think A) Skinny table could also be useful in this situation to optimize performance.
upvoted 0 times
...
Chanel
2 months ago
Partition data using Divisions seems like the way to go. That'll help manage the data visibility across the different regions and offices.
upvoted 0 times
Vallie
1 months ago
Partition data using Divisions seems like the way to go. That'll help manage the data visibility across the different regions and offices.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leah
1 months ago
C) Deferred Sharing Recalculation
upvoted 0 times
...
Ailene
2 months ago
B) Partition data using Divisions
upvoted 0 times
...
Monte
2 months ago
A) Skinny table
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Ashley
2 months ago
I disagree, I believe C) Deferred Sharing Recalculation would be a better option. It will ensure that the sharing rules are recalculated correctly.
upvoted 0 times
...
Arlene
2 months ago
I think we should go with B) Partition data using Divisions. It will help us organize the data better.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77