Cyber Monday 2024! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Salesforce Exam User Experience Designer Topic 2 Question 68 Discussion

Actual exam question for Salesforce's User Experience Designer exam
Question #: 68
Topic #: 2
[All User Experience Designer Questions]

A UX Designer determines that the usability of their company's Salesforce org could be improved if there was a tight relationship between the objects Container and Container Bids. For example, Container Bids should be deleted automatically whenever its associated Container is deleted.

Which type of relationship should be used to optimize the link between Container and Container Bids?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

To optimize the relationship between two objects in Salesforce, such as Container and Container Bids, where there is a need for a tight relationship and cascading delete functionality, a Master-Detail relationship is most suitable. This type of relationship has the following characteristics:

Cascading Delete: When a record in the master (or parent) object is deleted, all related detail (or child) records are automatically deleted. This ensures data integrity and aligns with the requirement that Container Bids should be deleted when their associated Container is deleted.

Tight Coupling: A Master-Detail relationship creates a strong linkage between the two objects, where the detail (child) record's existence is dependent on the master (parent) record. This is appropriate for scenarios where the child record should not exist without its parent.

Options B (Hierarchical Lookup) and C (Many-to-one Lookup) do not provide the same level of dependency and cascading delete functionality inherent in a Master-Detail relationship.

Reference: Salesforce's official documentation provides extensive information on different types of relationships between objects, including Master-Detail relationships. The Salesforce Developer Documentation is a valuable resource for understanding how to set up and use these relationships to ensure data integrity and optimize application design.


Contribute your Thoughts:

Lucy
2 months ago
Ah, the old 'container and its contents' analogy strikes again! Master-detail is the way to go, folks. It's like having a box full of stuff - when you throw out the box, the stuff inside has to go too. Simple as that.
upvoted 0 times
Lajuana
25 days ago
B) Hierarchical Lookup
upvoted 0 times
...
Hana
1 months ago
That makes sense, it's like a parent-child relationship where the child record can't exist without the parent.
upvoted 0 times
...
Verlene
2 months ago
A) Master-Detail
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Terrilyn
2 months ago
I mean, come on, it's a no-brainer. Master-detail is the only way to make sure those Container Bids don't get left behind when their parent Container is gone. Gotta keep that data clean and organized, you know?
upvoted 0 times
Clemencia
2 months ago
A: Exactly, it's important to keep everything organized and prevent orphaned records.
upvoted 0 times
...
Daron
2 months ago
B: Yeah, it ensures that data integrity is maintained between Container and Container Bids.
upvoted 0 times
...
Erasmo
2 months ago
A: Totally agree, Master-Detail is the way to go for that tight relationship.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Terina
2 months ago
Haha, this is a no-brainer! Master-detail is the obvious choice. It's like having a container and its contents - you can't keep the contents without the container, can you?
upvoted 0 times
Harrison
30 days ago
User 4: Master-Detail it is then, thanks for the input!
upvoted 0 times
...
Murray
1 months ago
User 3: It's like a parent-child relationship, makes sense.
upvoted 0 times
...
Delsie
1 months ago
User 2: Definitely, it ensures that the relationship is maintained.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kerrie
1 months ago
User 1: I agree, Master-Detail is the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Willetta
3 months ago
I'm not sure, but I think Many-to-one-Lookup could also work for this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jaclyn
3 months ago
I agree with Jaime, Master-Detail would ensure automatic deletion of Container Bids.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nenita
3 months ago
A master-detail relationship is definitely the way to go here. It ensures that the Container Bids get deleted automatically when the parent Container is deleted. Keeps things nice and tidy!
upvoted 0 times
Billi
1 months ago
I don't think that would achieve the desired outcome of automatic deletion.
upvoted 0 times
...
Glory
1 months ago
C) Many-to-one-Lookup
upvoted 0 times
...
Janae
1 months ago
Exactly, it's the best option for this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marg
1 months ago
A) Master-Detail
upvoted 0 times
...
Shala
1 months ago
I don't think that would automatically delete the associated records.
upvoted 0 times
...
Arthur
1 months ago
B) Hierarchical Lookup
upvoted 0 times
...
Mitsue
2 months ago
That makes sense. It's important to maintain data integrity.
upvoted 0 times
...
Breana
2 months ago
A) Master-Detail
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Jaime
3 months ago
I think the relationship should be Master-Detail.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77