Cyber Monday 2024! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Salesforce Exam User Experience Designer Topic 3 Question 64 Discussion

Actual exam question for Salesforce's User Experience Designer exam
Question #: 64
Topic #: 3
[All User Experience Designer Questions]

A UX Designer determines that the usability of their company's Salesforce org could be improved if there was a tight relationship between the objects Container and Container Bids. For example, Container Bids should be deleted automatically whenever its associated Container is deleted.

Which type of relationship should be used to optimize the link between Container and Container Bids?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

To optimize the relationship between two objects in Salesforce, such as Container and Container Bids, where there is a need for a tight relationship and cascading delete functionality, a Master-Detail relationship is most suitable. This type of relationship has the following characteristics:

Cascading Delete: When a record in the master (or parent) object is deleted, all related detail (or child) records are automatically deleted. This ensures data integrity and aligns with the requirement that Container Bids should be deleted when their associated Container is deleted.

Tight Coupling: A Master-Detail relationship creates a strong linkage between the two objects, where the detail (child) record's existence is dependent on the master (parent) record. This is appropriate for scenarios where the child record should not exist without its parent.

Options B (Hierarchical Lookup) and C (Many-to-one Lookup) do not provide the same level of dependency and cascading delete functionality inherent in a Master-Detail relationship.

Reference: Salesforce's official documentation provides extensive information on different types of relationships between objects, including Master-Detail relationships. The Salesforce Developer Documentation is a valuable resource for understanding how to set up and use these relationships to ensure data integrity and optimize application design.


Contribute your Thoughts:

Nieves
4 months ago
Hmm, I'm not sure. B) Hierarchical Lookup seems like it could work too, but I'm not as familiar with that relationship type. Maybe I should brush up on my Salesforce data modeling before the exam.
upvoted 0 times
Lauran
3 months ago
Yeah, B) Hierarchical Lookup wouldn't automatically delete the child records like Master-Detail does. It's important to understand the different relationship types for Salesforce data modeling.
upvoted 0 times
...
Stacey
3 months ago
I agree, A) Master-Detail is the way to go for that kind of relationship. It's a strong link between the objects.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sylvie
3 months ago
A) Master-Detail would be the best choice for that scenario. It ensures that child records are deleted when the parent record is deleted.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Mignon
4 months ago
I'm not sure, but I think Hierarchical Lookup could also work for this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Stephane
5 months ago
I think the answer is A) Master-Detail. This type of relationship allows for automatic deletion of the child records (Container Bids) when the parent record (Container) is deleted, which is exactly what the question is asking for.
upvoted 0 times
Bambi
4 months ago
Yes, A) Master-Detail ensures the tight relationship needed between Container and Container Bids.
upvoted 0 times
...
Eun
4 months ago
I agree, A) Master-Detail is the correct answer for this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Walton
4 months ago
A) Master-Detail
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Rana
5 months ago
I agree with Myra, Master-Detail would ensure the automatic deletion of Container Bids.
upvoted 0 times
...
Myra
5 months ago
I think the relationship should be Master-Detail.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77