Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Salesforce Exam User Experience Designer Topic 6 Question 78 Discussion

Actual exam question for Salesforce's User Experience Designer exam
Question #: 78
Topic #: 6
[All User Experience Designer Questions]

A UX Designer determines that the usability of their company's Salesforce org could be improved if there was a tight relationship between the objects Container and Container Bids. For example, Container Bids should be deleted automatically whenever its associated Container is deleted.

Which type of relationship should be used to optimize the link between Container and Container Bids?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

To optimize the relationship between two objects in Salesforce, such as Container and Container Bids, where there is a need for a tight relationship and cascading delete functionality, a Master-Detail relationship is most suitable. This type of relationship has the following characteristics:

Cascading Delete: When a record in the master (or parent) object is deleted, all related detail (or child) records are automatically deleted. This ensures data integrity and aligns with the requirement that Container Bids should be deleted when their associated Container is deleted.

Tight Coupling: A Master-Detail relationship creates a strong linkage between the two objects, where the detail (child) record's existence is dependent on the master (parent) record. This is appropriate for scenarios where the child record should not exist without its parent.

Options B (Hierarchical Lookup) and C (Many-to-one Lookup) do not provide the same level of dependency and cascading delete functionality inherent in a Master-Detail relationship.

Reference: Salesforce's official documentation provides extensive information on different types of relationships between objects, including Master-Detail relationships. The Salesforce Developer Documentation is a valuable resource for understanding how to set up and use these relationships to ensure data integrity and optimize application design.


Contribute your Thoughts:

Cecily
2 days ago
Hmm, I'm not sure about that. Wouldn't a hierarchical lookup be a bit more flexible? That way, you could still maintain the relationship, but have a bit more control over the deletion process.
upvoted 0 times
...
Angella
7 days ago
I'm not sure, but I think Many-to-one-Lookup could also work in this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Christene
9 days ago
I agree with Kris, Master-Detail would ensure that Container Bids are deleted when Container is deleted.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shalon
11 days ago
I agree, master-detail is the correct choice. It's like a parent-child relationship - the Container is the parent, and the Container Bids are the children. Deleting the parent automatically deletes the children. Makes sense to me!
upvoted 0 times
Tequila
3 hours ago
A: I think the correct relationship type is A) Master-Detail.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Kris
12 days ago
I think the relationship should be Master-Detail.
upvoted 0 times
...
Judy
18 days ago
A master-detail relationship is definitely the way to go here. It's the perfect solution to ensure that Container Bids are deleted automatically when their associated Container is deleted. Simple and effective!
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77