Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

SAP Exam C_ABAPD_2309 Topic 1 Question 11 Discussion

Actual exam question for SAP's C_ABAPD_2309 exam
Question #: 11
Topic #: 1
[All C_ABAPD_2309 Questions]

Given the following Core Data Service View Entity Data Definition:

1 @AccessControl.authorizationCheck: #NOT_REQUIRED

2 DEFINE VIEW ENTITY demo_flight_info_join

3 AS SELECT

4 FROM scarr AS a

5 LEFT OUTER JOIN scounter AS c

6 LEFT OUTER JOIN sairport AS p

7 ON p.id = c.airport

8 ON a.carrid = c.carrid

9 {

10 a.carrid AS carrier_id,

11 p.id AS airport_id,

12 c.countnum AS counter_number

13 }

In what order will the join statements be executed?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

The order in which the join statements will be executed is:

scarr will be joined with scounter first and the result will be joined with sairport.

This is because the join statements are nested from left to right, meaning that the leftmost data source is joined with the next data source, and the result is joined with the next data source, and so on. The join condition for each pair of data sources is specified by the ON clause that follows the data source name. The join type for each pair of data sources is specified by the join operator that precedes the data source name. In this case, the join operator is LEFT OUTER JOIN, which means that all the rows from the left data source are included in the result, and only the matching rows from the right data source are included. If there is no matching row from the right data source, the corresponding fields are filled with initial values1.

Therefore, the join statements will be executed as follows:

First, scarr AS a will be joined with scounter AS c using the join condition a.carrid = c.carrid. This means that all the rows from scarr will be included in the result, and only the rows from scounter that have the same value for the carrid field will be included. If there is no matching row from scounter, the countnum field will be filled with an initial value.

Second, the result of the first join will be joined with sairport AS p using the join condition p.id = c.airport. This means that all the rows from the first join will be included in the result, and only the rows from sairport that have the same value for the id field as the airport field from the first join will be included. If there is no matching row from sairport, the id field will be filled with an initial value.


Contribute your Thoughts:

Ronnie
4 months ago
I agree with Regenia, option C seems logical as scarr is joined with sairport first.
upvoted 0 times
...
Regenia
5 months ago
I see both points, but I believe option C is the correct sequence based on the definition provided.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jennifer
5 months ago
I disagree, I believe option A is right because scarr is joined first with scounter.
upvoted 0 times
...
Derrick
5 months ago
Haha, this is like a game of 'join the dots' for the database folks. Option A is the way to go!
upvoted 0 times
Nell
4 months ago
Definitely, option A seems to be the correct order of execution for the join statements.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dierdre
4 months ago
Yes, it makes sense to join scarr with scounter first before joining with sairport.
upvoted 0 times
...
Karrie
4 months ago
I agree, it's like connecting the dots in a database.
upvoted 0 times
...
Erasmo
4 months ago
I agree, option A seems to be the correct order of execution.
upvoted 0 times
...
Candida
4 months ago
Option A) scarr will be joined with scounter first and the result will be joined with sairport.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Emilio
5 months ago
I think option B is correct because sairport is joined first to scounter.
upvoted 0 times
...
Hershel
5 months ago
I agree with Letha, the order of the joins matches the order in the code. Option A is the right answer.
upvoted 0 times
Burma
5 months ago
That makes sense, the code clearly shows that order of joins. Option A is correct.
upvoted 0 times
...
Elmer
5 months ago
Option A) scarr will be joined with scounter first and the result will be joined with sairport.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Bulah
5 months ago
I am inclined to agree with Jesusita. I believe scounter will be joined to sairport first, and then the result will be joined with scarr.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sheldon
5 months ago
Hmm, interesting. What about you, Dave? What's your opinion on this?
upvoted 0 times
...
Jesusita
6 months ago
I disagree with Mirta. I think sairport will be joined to scounter first, and then the result will be joined with scarr.
upvoted 0 times
...
Letha
6 months ago
Option A seems to be the correct answer. The join statements are executed in the order they are listed in the code, which is scarr with scounter, then the result with sairport.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mirta
6 months ago
I believe the correct order is scarr joined with sairport first, then joined with scounter.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sheldon
6 months ago
I think the order of join statements is important in this Core Data Service View Entity. What do you guys think about it?
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77