Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location PL
Mob_nav_barsMENU

SAP Exam C_ABAPD_2309 Topic 1 Question 12 Discussion

Actual exam question for SAP's C_ABAPD_2309 exam
Question #: 12
Topic #: 1
[All C_ABAPD_2309 Questions]

You have two internal tables itab1 and itab2.What is true for using the expression itab1 = corresponding #( itab2 )? Note: There are 2 correct answers to this question.

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B, C

The expression itab1 = corresponding #( itab2 ) is a constructor expression with the component operator CORRESPONDING that assigns the contents of the internal table itab2 to the internal table itab1. The following statements are true for using this expression:

B: itab1 and itab2 must have at least one field name in common. This is because the component operator CORRESPONDING assigns the identically named columns of itab2 to the identically named columns of itab1 by default, according to the rules of MOVE-CORRESPONDING for internal tables.If itab1 and itab2 do not have any field name in common, the expression will not assign any value to itab1 and it will remain initial or unchanged1

C: Fields with the same name and the same type will be copied from itab2 to itab1. This is because the component operator CORRESPONDING assigns the identically named columns of itab2 to the identically named columns of itab1 by default, according to the rules of MOVE-CORRESPONDING for internal tables.If the columns have the same name but different types, the assignment will try to perform a conversion between the types, which may result in a loss of precision, a truncation, or a runtime error, depending on the types involved1

The following statements are false for using this expression:

A: Fields with the same name but with different types may be copied from itab2 to itab1. This is not true, as explained in statement C.The assignment will try to perform a conversion between the types, which may result in a loss of precision, a truncation, or a runtime error, depending on the types involved1

D: itab1 and itab2 must have the same data type. This is not true, as the component operator CORRESPONDING can assign the contents of an internal table of one type to another internal table of a different type, as long as they have at least one field name in common. The target type of the expression is determined by the left-hand side of the assignment, which is itab1 in this case.The expression will create an internal table of the same type as itab1 and assign it to itab11


by Tonette at Mar 19, 2024, 10:16 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium C_ABAPD_2309 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel
Georgene
4 months ago
This question is a piece of cake! I could do this in my sleep. Hey, did you hear about the programmer who got stuck in the shower because the instructions said to 'turn on the shower and getout'?
upvoted 0 times
Ressie
3 months ago
C) Fields with the same name and the same type will be copied from itab2 to itab1.
upvoted 0 times
...
Darrel
4 months ago
B) itab1 and itab2 must have at least one field name in common.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sharika
4 months ago
A) Fields with the same name but with different types may be copied from itab2 to itab1.
upvoted 0 times
...
Joanna
4 months ago
C) Fields with the same name and the same type will be copied from itab2 to itab1.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kerry
4 months ago
B) itab1 and itab2 must have at least one field name in common.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gladys
4 months ago
A) Fields with the same name but with different types may be copied from itab2 to itab1.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Elfriede
4 months ago
I think option B is also important to consider because it ensures there is at least one common field name between itab1 and itab2.
upvoted 0 times
...
Teri
5 months ago
I am not sure, but I think option A and C both make sense. It depends on the specific scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jill
5 months ago
I disagree, I believe option C is more accurate because it specifies that fields with the same name and type will be copied.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sage
5 months ago
A) Fields with the same name but with different types may be copied from itab2 to itab1. Hmm, I'm not sure about that one. Sounds a bit risky.
upvoted 0 times
Tamesha
4 months ago
C) Fields with the same name and the same type will be copied from itab2 to itab1.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lenna
4 months ago
B) itab1 and itab2 must have at least one field name in common.
upvoted 0 times
...
Amina
4 months ago
A) Fields with the same name but with different types may be copied from itab2 to itab1. Hmm, I'm not sure about that one. Sounds a bit risky.
upvoted 0 times
...
Renea
4 months ago
A) Fields with the same name but with different types may be copied from itab2 to itab1. Hmm, I'm not sure about that one. Sounds a bit risky.
upvoted 0 times
...
Beckie
4 months ago
C) Fields with the same name and the same type will be copied from itab2 to itab1. So it's important for the fields to match exactly.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lavelle
4 months ago
B) itab1 and itab2 must have at least one field name in common. That makes sense, they need to match up somehow.
upvoted 0 times
...
Doretha
4 months ago
A) Fields with the same name but with different types may be copied from itab2 to itab1. I think it's possible, but you have to be careful.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Justine
5 months ago
B) itab1 and itab2 must have at least one field name in common. That's a given, right? Can't copy anything if there's no overlap.
upvoted 0 times
Luis
4 months ago
Exactly, without any common field names, the corresponding #( itab2 ) won't work.
upvoted 0 times
...
Luis
5 months ago
Yes, that's correct. The fields need to have at least one common name to copy over.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Dona
5 months ago
C) Fields with the same name and the same type will be copied from itab2 to itab1. Seems like the most straightforward answer to me.
upvoted 0 times
Ronnie
5 months ago
Make sure both tables have at least one field name in common for the expression to work.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ronnie
5 months ago
Yes, that's correct. The fields with the same name and type will be copied over.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Jesus
5 months ago
I think option A is correct because it allows fields with the same name but different types to be copied.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mike
5 months ago
I always get confused with questions like these. I hope this doesn't affect my overall exam score.
upvoted 0 times
...
Glennis
6 months ago
I think both A and C could be correct. It depends on the scenarios we are dealing with.
upvoted 0 times
...
Graciela
6 months ago
I disagree, I believe option C is correct as it mentions copying fields with the same name and type.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rolande
6 months ago
I think option A is correct because it allows us to copy fields with different types.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77