SAP Exam C_ARP2P_2308 Topic 1 Question 14 Discussion

Actual exam question for SAP's C_ARP2P_2308 exam

Question #: 14
Topic #: 1

[All C_ARP2P_2308 Questions]

which buying process is recommended by SAP Ariba for facilities and maintenance spend?

ANon-po invoice

Bcollaborative requisition

CNo release contract

DRelease contract

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: D

by Belen at Apr 08, 2024, 01:48 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium C_ARP2P_2308 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Glen

4 months ago

I don't know, but I heard the answer is always C) No release contract. That's the secret to success in the world of facilities and maintenance spend!

upvoted 0 times

Edna

3 months ago

No, I'm pretty sure it's C) No release contract.

upvoted 0 times

...

Carmen

4 months ago

I think the answer is D) Release contract.

upvoted 0 times

...

Tarra

4 months ago

Hmm, I'm not sure. Maybe I should just ask the Magic 8-Ball for the answer. It's probably more reliable than SAP Ariba's recommendations anyway.

upvoted 0 times

...

Gabriele

4 months ago

I'm torn between B) and D), but I'm leaning towards D) just to be on the safe side. Can't go wrong with a release contract, right?

upvoted 0 times

...

Lina

4 months ago

D) Release contract seems like the safest bet. It's probably what SAP Ariba recommends for a reason.

upvoted 0 times

Margart

3 months ago

Yeah, SAP Ariba probably recommends it for a good reason.

upvoted 0 times

...

Gayla

3 months ago

I agree, it seems like the safest option.

upvoted 0 times

...

Corazon

3 months ago

I think D) Release contract is the way to go.

upvoted 0 times

...

Gerald

3 months ago

B) Collaborative requisition can help streamline the buying process as well.

upvoted 0 times

...

Sherita

4 months ago

A) Non-po invoice is also a good option for facilities and maintenance spend.

upvoted 0 times

...

Lettie

4 months ago

D) Release contract seems like the safest bet. It's probably what SAP Ariba recommends for a reason.

upvoted 0 times

...

Gaynell

5 months ago

I see where you're coming from, But Release contract provides more visibility and compliance.

upvoted 0 times

...

Reita

5 months ago

I think B) collaborative requisition is the way to go. It sounds like the most efficient option for facilities and maintenance spend.

upvoted 0 times

Olive

4 months ago

In the end, it's important to choose a buying process that aligns with the specific needs and goals of facilities and maintenance spend.

upvoted 0 times

...

Reyes

4 months ago

I see the benefits of D) Release contract for establishing clear terms and conditions upfront for facilities and maintenance spend.

upvoted 0 times

...

Peggie

4 months ago

B) collaborative requisition allows for better communication and coordination between different departments involved in facilities and maintenance spend.

upvoted 0 times

...

Glendora

4 months ago

C) No release contract could lead to potential issues with tracking and approval, so I would lean towards options like B) collaborative requisition or D) Release contract.

upvoted 0 times

...

Laura

4 months ago

Non-po invoice might work for smaller purchases, but for facilities and maintenance spend, I would go with a more collaborative approach like B) collaborative requisition.

upvoted 0 times

...

Norah

5 months ago

I think D) Release contract could also be a good option for streamlining the buying process.

upvoted 0 times

...

Truman

5 months ago

D) Release contract is also a good option for ensuring compliance and managing costs.

upvoted 0 times

...

Hyman

5 months ago

I agree, B) collaborative requisition seems like the best choice for facilities and maintenance spend.

upvoted 0 times

...

Florinda

5 months ago

I personally prefer Non-po invoice for facilities and maintenance spend. It's quicker and more flexible.

upvoted 0 times

...

Markus

6 months ago

I agree with Release contract ensures proper authorization and control over the spending.

upvoted 0 times

...

Karina

6 months ago

I think SAP Ariba recommends using Release contract for facilities and maintenance spend.

upvoted 0 times

...

Honestly, I'm leaning towards 'collaborative requisition' too. It just seems like the most sensible approach for something like facilities and maintenance, where you probably want to get input from multiple stakeholders.

upvoted 0 times

Kristal

5 months ago

Non-po invoice could streamline the process and make it more efficient.

upvoted 0 times

...

Ahmed

5 months ago

I think Release contract might also be a good option for better control.

upvoted 0 times

...

Billye

6 months ago

I agree, collaborative requisition allows for input from different parties.

upvoted 0 times

...

Clorinda

7 months ago

Haha, can you imagine trying to explain the 'non-po invoice' option to your boss? 'Yeah, so we just kinda...bought stuff without a purchase order. Hope that's cool!' I'm gonna go with 'release contract' on this one.

upvoted 0 times

...

Bobbye

7 months ago

Oof, 'non-po invoice'? That sounds like a bit of a nightmare. I can't imagine that's the recommended approach, unless they're really trying to make things as difficult as possible for the procurement team.

upvoted 0 times

...

Janine

7 months ago

The 'no release contract' option doesn't seem right to me. Facilities and maintenance are pretty important, so I doubt SAP Ariba would recommend just going with no formal contract in place.

upvoted 0 times

...

Cordelia

7 months ago

I was thinking the 'collaborative requisition' might be the way to go. That sounds like it could involve multiple stakeholders working together to make a purchase, which could be useful for something like facilities and maintenance.

upvoted 0 times

...

Herman

7 months ago

Hmm, this is an interesting one. I'm not too familiar with the SAP Ariba recommendations, but I suppose the 'release contract' option could be a good choice here. It seems to imply some kind of formal agreement, which might be appropriate for facilities and maintenance spend.

upvoted 0 times

...