New Year Sale ! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

SAP Exam C_ARSUM_2308 Topic 6 Question 16 Discussion

Actual exam question for SAP's C_ARSUM_2308 exam
Question #: 16
Topic #: 6
[All C_ARSUM_2308 Questions]

Your customer wants to trigger risk controls in supplier risk engagement projects based on responses to questions from the inherent risk screening questionnaire. Which option do you recommend?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

Contribute your Thoughts:

Pa
5 months ago
C all the way, baby! Visibility conditions are where it's at. You can get as fancy as you want with your risk controls, and the customer will be none the wiser. Just don't forget to throw in a few emojis to make it extra user-friendly.
upvoted 0 times
...
Clement
6 months ago
Let's not forget the importance of a good old-fashioned paper trail! I'd go with option A - mapping the questions to IDs. That way, you can keep everything nice and organized. Plus, it's like having a secret code that only the risk management ninjas can decipher!
upvoted 0 times
...
Shenika
6 months ago
Wow, this is a tricky one. I'm torn between B and C. Setting the answer type to Whole Number could work, but visibility conditions seem more flexible. Decisions, decisions...
upvoted 0 times
Gayla
4 months ago
I agree, but applying a visibility condition might give us more control.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carey
5 months ago
I think setting the answer type to Whole Number is the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Marilynn
6 months ago
Guys, option D could be it. Matching question name with control name links responses directly to controls.
upvoted 0 times
...
Troy
6 months ago
I get what you mean, but mapping a question to a question ID makes it more structured.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leoma
6 months ago
Really? I was leaning towards C, applying a visibility condition sounds more logical.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marion
7 months ago
I think it's option A, map each question to a question ID.
upvoted 0 times
...
Abel
7 months ago
Yeah, the question has me stumped. What did you think?
upvoted 0 times
...
Micah
7 months ago
D seems like the most straightforward solution. Matching the question name with the control name makes it easy to see what's triggering what. Plus, it's more user-friendly for the customer.
upvoted 0 times
Lynelle
6 months ago
Matching the question name with the control name makes it easy to see what's triggering what.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ashlyn
6 months ago
D seems like the most straightforward solution.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Willodean
7 months ago
Hmm, I'm not sure. Mapping the questions to IDs sounds like a good way to keep things organized, but it might not directly trigger the risk controls. I'd lean towards option C as well.
upvoted 0 times
...
Josphine
7 months ago
I think option C is the way to go. Applying visibility conditions to each question allows you to easily trigger the risk controls based on the responses.
upvoted 0 times
Arminda
6 months ago
Thanks for the input, everyone. Option C it is then!
upvoted 0 times
...
Gaston
6 months ago
Great choice! Option C will definitely help in effectively managing the risk controls.
upvoted 0 times
...
Candida
6 months ago
I think I will go with option C as well. It seems like the best approach for this situation.
upvoted 0 times
...
Goldie
7 months ago
I agree. It seems like the most efficient option out of the choices given.
upvoted 0 times
...
Earlean
7 months ago
That makes sense. It would definitely streamline the process.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ammie
7 months ago
I think option C is the way to go. Applying visibility conditions to each question allows you to easily trigger the risk controls based on the responses.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Patti
7 months ago
Anyone know the right approach for the risk controls in supplier projects?
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77