SAP Exam C_BRSOM_2020 Topic 5 Question 41 Discussion

Actual exam question for SAP's C_BRSOM_2020 exam

Question #: 41
Topic #: 5

[All C_BRSOM_2020 Questions]

Which actions can you perform for a master agreement main item that's in "released" status? Note

AAssign the cross-catalog mapping version

BEdit the billing cycle

CEdit the parties involved

DAssign the authorized partners

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: C, D

by Veronica at Jun 29, 2024, 01:23 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium C_BRSOM_2020 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Willard

3 months ago

Wait, can we just change the status to 'draft' and then do whatever we want? Asking for a friend.

upvoted 0 times

Rolf

2 months ago

You can assign the cross-catalog mapping version for a master agreement main item in 'released' status.

upvoted 0 times

...

Mabelle

2 months ago

No, you can't change the status to 'draft' once it's in 'released' status.

upvoted 0 times

...

Alfred

3 months ago

I don't know, man. Assigning authorized partners sounds like it could be a valid option too. Maybe I'll go with a combination of A and D.

upvoted 0 times

...

Filiberto

3 months ago

Ah, the classic 'edit the billing cycle' option. Gotta love these exam questions that try to trick you. I'll stick with A.

upvoted 0 times

...

Pearly

3 months ago

Hold on, can we edit the parties involved? That sounds like a risky move for a released item. I'd go with option A.

upvoted 0 times

...

Chu

3 months ago

I think option A is the correct answer. Assigning the cross-catalog mapping version seems like a logical action for a released master agreement main item.

upvoted 0 times

...

Gail

3 months ago

This question is making my brain hurt. I'm just going to close my eyes and pick an answer. *Blindly points* D it is!

upvoted 0 times

Carin

2 months ago

Nickolas: Let's review the options together then.

upvoted 0 times

...

Nickolas

2 months ago

User 2: I'm not sure, maybe we should double check the options before deciding.

upvoted 0 times

...

Barrett

2 months ago

User 1: I think you're right, D sounds like a good choice.

upvoted 0 times

...

Ulysses

3 months ago

Aha, I've got it! The answer is B. Editing the billing cycle, because who doesn't love a good old-fashioned billing cycle tweak, am I right?

upvoted 0 times

...

Merlyn

3 months ago

Wait, is this a trick question? I'm going to go with A. Assigning the cross-catalog mapping version sounds like a fun challenge!

upvoted 0 times

...

Argelia

3 months ago

I'm going with C. Editing the parties involved just feels more intuitive for a master agreement, don't you think?

upvoted 0 times

Ruby

2 months ago

That's a good point, having the right partners is key for a successful agreement.

upvoted 0 times

...

Kristel

2 months ago

I would go with D. Assigning the authorized partners seems like a crucial step.

upvoted 0 times

...

Blondell

2 months ago

I agree, it's important to have the right parties involved in a master agreement.

upvoted 0 times

...

Mammie

2 months ago

I think editing the parties involved is a good choice.

upvoted 0 times

...

Alida

2 months ago

C) Edit the parties involved

upvoted 0 times

...

Dolores

2 months ago

B) Edit the billing cycle

upvoted 0 times

...

Nina

2 months ago

A) Assign the cross-catalog mapping version

upvoted 0 times

...

Cristina

2 months ago

I see your point, but I believe editing the billing cycle could also be necessary for a master agreement.

upvoted 0 times

...

Sheridan

2 months ago

I think assigning the authorized partners is also important for a master agreement.

upvoted 0 times

...

Candra

3 months ago

I agree, editing the parties involved seems like a crucial action for a master agreement.

upvoted 0 times

...

Justine

4 months ago

I believe we can edit the parties involved for a master agreement in 'released' status. It's important for keeping the agreement up to date.

upvoted 0 times

...

Margarett

4 months ago

I'm not sure about editing the billing cycle. I think that might be restricted in 'released' status.

upvoted 0 times

...

Alyssa

4 months ago

I agree with Corrinne. It makes sense to be able to assign the authorized partners at that stage.

upvoted 0 times

...

Kris

4 months ago

Hmm, I think the correct answer is D. Assigning authorized partners seems like the logical choice for a 'released' status agreement.

upvoted 0 times

Doyle

3 months ago

I think it's actually C. Editing the parties involved might be necessary for a 'released' status agreement.

upvoted 0 times

...

Fernanda

3 months ago

I agree, assigning authorized partners makes sense for a 'released' status agreement.

upvoted 0 times

...

Corrinne

4 months ago

I think we can assign the cross-catalog mapping version for a master agreement in 'released' status.

upvoted 0 times

...