Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location PL
Mob_nav_barsMENU

SAP Exam C_BRU2C_2020 Topic 4 Question 35 Discussion

Actual exam question for SAP's C_BRU2C_2020 exam
Question #: 35
Topic #: 4
[All C_BRU2C_2020 Questions]

Your customer discovers that the Collection Call List created with the dunning run is incorrect. Which of the following activities do you do first?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D

by Alease at Apr 08, 2024, 01:21 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium C_BRU2C_2020 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel
Yolando
4 months ago
Transfer the items to 'inactive' status? Sounds like a lot of effort. I'd just delete the whole dunning run and start over. What could go wrong?
upvoted 0 times
Nichelle
4 months ago
User 3: I agree with Hana, deleting the dunning run seems like the best option to avoid any mistakes.
upvoted 0 times
...
Hana
4 months ago
User 2: But wouldn't it be easier to just transfer the items to 'inactive' status?
upvoted 0 times
...
Sheldon
4 months ago
User 1: I think we should just cancel the dunning run and start fresh.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Dallas
5 months ago
Deleting or canceling the dunning run might seem like a quick fix, but that could cause more problems down the line. Transferring to 'inactive' status is the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
Elina
5 months ago
Reprocessing the business rules framework sounds like a lot of work. I'd go with option B and transfer the items to 'inactive' status instead.
upvoted 0 times
Orville
4 months ago
Yeah, transferring the items to 'inactive' status would be a quicker solution.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tien
4 months ago
I agree, reprocessing the business rules framework does seem like a lot of work.
upvoted 0 times
...
Deangelo
4 months ago
Yeah, transferring the items to 'inactive' status would be a quicker solution.
upvoted 0 times
...
Omega
4 months ago
Agreed, let's go with option B and make the items inactive.
upvoted 0 times
...
Linn
4 months ago
That sounds like a good idea, it's less work than reprocessing the business rules framework.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nan
4 months ago
Let's transfer the call list items to 'inactive' status.
upvoted 0 times
...
Peggie
5 months ago
I agree, reprocessing the business rules framework does seem like a lot of work.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Yolando
5 months ago
Maybe transferring call list items to 'inactive' status could help before taking further action.
upvoted 0 times
...
Peter
6 months ago
Oh, Dave. Deleting the dunning run? That's like throwing the baby out with the bathwater. Option B is clearly the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
Malcom
4 months ago
Canceling the dunning run could have unintended consequences, so I would choose option B as well.
upvoted 0 times
...
Vilma
5 months ago
Deleting the dunning run might cause more problems, so I would go with option B.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nguyet
5 months ago
I think transferring call list items to 'inactive' status is the safest bet.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kattie
5 months ago
But wouldn't reprocessing the business rules framework fix the issue?
upvoted 0 times
...
Fatima
5 months ago
I agree, option B seems like the most logical choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Martha
6 months ago
I disagree, I believe we should reprocess the business rules framework to correct the errors.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rosendo
6 months ago
I think we should cancel the dunning run first to stop any further incorrect actions.
upvoted 0 times
...
Pura
6 months ago
Oh no, the Collection Call List created with the dunning run is incorrect!
upvoted 0 times
Emile
6 months ago
User 1
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Virgie
7 months ago
Hmm, I don't know. Seems like we'd be just sweeping the problem under the rug by doing that. I think we need to be more proactive and really get to the bottom of what's going on.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mozell
7 months ago
That's a good point. Maybe we should consider option B first - transferring the call list items to an 'inactive' status. That would at least prevent any further issues until we can investigate the problem.
upvoted 0 times
...
Karl
7 months ago
But what if the business rules are actually fine, and the problem is with the data or some other system component? Reprocessing the framework might not be the best first step.
upvoted 0 times
...
Daren
7 months ago
Yeah, I'm leaning towards option A - reprocessing the business rules framework. That will allow us to reevaluate the rules and hopefully identify the issue that led to the incorrect call list.
upvoted 0 times
...
Beatriz
7 months ago
I agree. I wouldn't just start deleting or canceling the dunning run without understanding the root cause. That could make the situation even worse.
upvoted 0 times
...
Xochitl
7 months ago
Hmm, this is an interesting question. I think the first thing we should do is assess the situation and understand why the Collection Call List is incorrect. We need to figure out what went wrong with the dunning run before we can take any corrective action.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77