Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

SAP Exam C_BYD15_1908 Topic 3 Question 46 Discussion

Actual exam question for SAP's C_BYD15_1908 exam
Question #: 46
Topic #: 3
[All C_BYD15_1908 Questions]

A company needs to provide statutory reporting in local GAAP within its country of registration.

In addition, IFRS statutory reports are necessary due to group reporting.

Which one of the following approaches can achieve multi-GAAP reporting in SAP Business ByDesign?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

Contribute your Thoughts:

France
5 months ago
But option B is less invasive. Just close and adjust.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jaclyn
5 months ago
I think C could work too. One set of books for each principle.
upvoted 0 times
...
Antonio
5 months ago
Because defining one ledger for local GAAP and one for IFRS sounds straightforward.
upvoted 0 times
...
Meaghan
5 months ago
Haha, I bet the person who came up with option A was just messing with us. 'Define one company with local GAAP, one with IFRS'? That's just asking for trouble!
upvoted 0 times
Louisa
5 months ago
I agree, Option C seems like a safer choice for multi-GAAP reporting.
upvoted 0 times
...
Youlanda
5 months ago
Option A does seem a bit risky, it could get confusing.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Tijuana
5 months ago
C looks promising. Two sets of books? That's double the fun and double the headaches!
upvoted 0 times
...
Peter
6 months ago
Hmm, why D?
upvoted 0 times
...
Kimbery
6 months ago
I'm leaning towards B. Adjusting the local GAAP period to get IFRS? That's some real accounting magic right there.
upvoted 0 times
France
4 months ago
It's definitely a tough decision to make.
upvoted 0 times
...
Deane
4 months ago
I still think option B is the most efficient choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Serina
4 months ago
True, having separate sets of books could simplify things.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dominque
4 months ago
Option C might be a good middle ground.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lai
5 months ago
I agree, adjusting the local GAAP period sounds like a challenge.
upvoted 0 times
...
Chandra
5 months ago
But option B seems like it could save time.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leonor
5 months ago
I think option A is more straightforward.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Wilson
6 months ago
Option D definitely seems the way to go. Separate ledgers for local GAAP and IFRS? Sounds like a piece of cake!
upvoted 0 times
...
Antonio
6 months ago
It's a bit specific. I think option D seems most practical.
upvoted 0 times
...
Yasuko
6 months ago
What do you think about the question on multi-GAAP reporting in SAP Business ByDesign?
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77