Cyber Monday 2024! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

SAP Exam C_C4H41_2405 Topic 11 Question 2 Discussion

Actual exam question for SAP's C_C4H41_2405 exam
Question #: 2
Topic #: 11
[All C_C4H41_2405 Questions]

You need to apply complex changes to an SAP Sales Cloud system after go live. Due to the nature of the changes, you need to test the changes before they take effect. Which option does SAP recommend for implementing these changes?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

Contribute your Thoughts:

Gayla
2 months ago
A) seems a bit convoluted, why create a local change project and then merge it back? Seems like an unnecessary step.
upvoted 0 times
Letha
2 months ago
C) Creating a remote change project in the production system first could cause issues if the changes don't work as expected.
upvoted 0 times
...
Aileen
2 months ago
A) Yeah, it would be more efficient to test in a separate system before replicating the changes.
upvoted 0 times
...
Brett
2 months ago
B) I think creating a remote change project in the test system makes more sense.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ettie
2 months ago
A) I agree, creating a local change project just to merge it back seems like extra work.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Shawnda
2 months ago
B) sounds like a good approach - keep the test and production environments separate, that's important for complex changes.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marci
3 months ago
C) seems like the most straightforward option to test changes before applying them to the production system. Can't risk messing up the live system, you know?
upvoted 0 times
Lili
1 months ago
Definitely, we can't afford any mistakes in the production environment.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kaitlyn
1 months ago
Yeah, testing changes before applying them to the live system is crucial.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lavera
2 months ago
I agree, option C seems like the safest choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Ciara
3 months ago
I prefer option B. Replicating the changes from the test system to the production system seems like a more efficient way to implement complex changes.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tu
3 months ago
I agree with Annabelle. Testing in a separate environment is crucial to ensure that the changes do not disrupt the live system.
upvoted 0 times
...
Annabelle
3 months ago
I think option A is the best choice because it allows us to test the changes in a separate environment before merging them with the production system.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77