Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

SAP Exam C_C4H450_21 Topic 2 Question 32 Discussion

Actual exam question for SAP's C_C4H450_21 exam
Question #: 32
Topic #: 2
[All C_C4H450_21 Questions]

You added a new field named "ENVIRONMENT _RISK in the product business object in SAP Sales and Service Cloud. You want to populate the new field "ENVIRONMENT RISK in SAP Sales and Service Cloud with the value of the standard field "EnvironmentRelevance Indicator in SAP S/4HANA How would you extend the message mapping in SAP Cloud Integration to perform this task?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

Contribute your Thoughts:

Narcisa
3 months ago
Option B is definitely the way to go. Downloading and importing the WSDL is the most robust and reliable solution.
upvoted 0 times
...
Heike
3 months ago
I'd go with Option B as well. Importing the WSDL is the safest bet to ensure the mapping is accurate.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rory
3 months ago
Haha, did anyone else get a chuckle out of the 'ENVIRONMENT _RISK' typo in the question? Talk about a risky environment!
upvoted 0 times
...
Ciara
3 months ago
I'm with Fatima on this one. Option B seems the most efficient and reliable method.
upvoted 0 times
...
Fatima
3 months ago
Option B looks like the way to go! Downloading and importing the WSDL is the most straightforward approach.
upvoted 0 times
Alyce
2 months ago
Yes, I think downloading the extended WSDL and then mapping the fields is the way to go for this task.
upvoted 0 times
...
In
2 months ago
I agree, it seems like the easiest way to get the job done efficiently.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sheridan
2 months ago
Option B looks like the way to go! Downloading and importing the WSDL is the most straightforward approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Bettina
3 months ago
Anyone else feel like the correct answer is hidden somewhere in the fine print? I'm getting a headache just reading these options.
upvoted 0 times
...
Herschel
3 months ago
Option C sounds like a lot of back-and-forth between systems. Why not just keep it in the Cloud Integration layer where we can do it all in one place?
upvoted 0 times
Owen
2 months ago
Let's go with Option A then, it's more efficient.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sherill
2 months ago
Yeah, Option C does seem like a lot of unnecessary steps.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shaquana
2 months ago
I agree, it's simpler to just add the field directly in SAP Cloud Integration.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lang
3 months ago
Option A seems like the most straightforward approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Lindsey
3 months ago
Option D looks like a real head-scratcher. Creating variables and updating externalized parameters? That's way too convoluted for this task.
upvoted 0 times
...
Wendell
4 months ago
I think Option A is the way to go. It's a simple two-step process of adding the field and mapping it. No need to mess around with downloading and importing WSDLs.
upvoted 0 times
Rikki
2 months ago
Option D seems like a good way to manage externalized parameters for the new field.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tommy
2 months ago
Option C might be a bit more complicated with exporting and importing WSDLs.
upvoted 0 times
...
Florinda
3 months ago
I think Option B could work too, importing the extended WSDL directly.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lanie
3 months ago
I agree, Option A seems straightforward and efficient.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Matt
4 months ago
I'm not sure, but I think B could also be a valid option.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lanie
4 months ago
I disagree, I believe the answer is D.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ernie
4 months ago
I think the correct answer is A.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marylin
4 months ago
Option B seems the most straightforward. Why would I want to download the WSDL from S/4HANA when the target is the Sales and Service Cloud? That just adds an unnecessary step.
upvoted 0 times
Loise
3 months ago
User 2: I agree, downloading the WSDL from S/4HANA does seem like an extra step that may not be needed.
upvoted 0 times
...
Christiane
4 months ago
User 1: Option B does seem like the most direct approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77