Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25%
- Ends In
00:00:00
Coupon code:
SAVE25
X
Welcome to Pass4Success
Login
|
Sign up
-
Free
Preparation Discussions
Mail Us
support@pass4success.com
Location
PL
MENU
Home
Popular vendors
Salesforce
Microsoft
Nutanix
Cisco
Amazon
Google
CompTIA
SAP
VMware
Oracle
Fortinet
PeopleCert
Eccouncil
HP
Palo Alto Networks
Adobe
ServiceNow
Dell EMC
CheckPoint
Linux Foundation
Discount Deals
New
About
Contact
Login
Sign up
Home
Discussions
SAP Discussions
Exam C_C4H56I_34 Topic 1 Question 1 Discussion
SAP Exam C_C4H56I_34 Topic 1 Question 1 Discussion
Actual exam question for SAP's C_C4H56I_34 exam
Question #: 1
Topic #: 1
[All C_C4H56I_34 Questions]
What is the only way to change an active case type?
A
Copy an existing case type.
B
Edit the name of the existing case type.
C
It is not possible to change an existing case type.
D
Execute the Create New Version action.
Show Suggested Answer
Hide Answer
Suggested Answer:
A, D
by
Alease
at
Jan 27, 2024, 04:11 AM
Limited Time Offer
25%
Off
Get Premium C_C4H56I_34 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF
Contribute your Thoughts:
Submit
Cancel
Angella
5 months ago
I'm just gonna go with the 'it's not possible' option. Seems the safest bet to me. Less chance of messing something up, you know?
upvoted
0
times
Tiera
4 months ago
User3: I'm going with option D. I think creating a new version is the way to go.
upvoted
0
times
...
Vashti
4 months ago
User2: Yeah, I agree. It's not worth the risk of messing something up.
upvoted
0
times
...
Donte
4 months ago
Yeah, I agree. It's always better to play it safe when making changes.
upvoted
0
times
...
Lavera
4 months ago
I think that's a good choice. Better safe than sorry.
upvoted
0
times
...
Edmond
5 months ago
User1: I think I'll go with option C too. Better safe than sorry.
upvoted
0
times
...
...
Josephine
5 months ago
C'mon, it's gotta be D. Who would even try to edit the name of an active case type? That just sounds like a disaster waiting to happen.
upvoted
0
times
Helaine
4 months ago
D) Execute the Create New Version action.
upvoted
0
times
...
Rochell
5 months ago
A) Copy an existing case type.
upvoted
0
times
...
...
Kristin
5 months ago
Hmm, I'm not sure about that. Copying an existing case type seems like it might be a simpler solution. But I guess that wouldn't really 'change' the active one, would it?
upvoted
0
times
Juan
5 months ago
B) Edit the name of the existing case type.
upvoted
0
times
...
Reid
5 months ago
A) Copy an existing case type.
upvoted
0
times
...
...
Dulce
5 months ago
I think option D is the way to go. Creating a new version is the best way to modify an active case type without messing up existing cases.
upvoted
0
times
Dorthy
4 months ago
Yes, that seems to be the most efficient way to change an active case type.
upvoted
0
times
...
Christa
4 months ago
So, we all agree that executing the Create New Version action is the best choice.
upvoted
0
times
...
Detra
5 months ago
True, it's better to keep the existing cases intact.
upvoted
0
times
...
Daniel
5 months ago
I think editing the name of the existing case type might cause confusion.
upvoted
0
times
...
Jesus
5 months ago
But wouldn't copying an existing case type also work?
upvoted
0
times
...
Alita
5 months ago
I agree, creating a new version is the safest option.
upvoted
0
times
...
...
Log in to Pass4Success
×
Sign in:
Forgot my password
Log in
Report Comment
×
Is the comment made by
USERNAME
spam or abusive?
Commenting
×
In order to participate in the comments you need to be logged-in.
You can
sign-up
or
login
Save
Cancel
az-700
pass4success
az-104
200-301
200-201
cissp
350-401
350-201
350-501
350-601
350-801
350-901
az-720
az-305
pl-300
Angella
5 months agoTiera
4 months agoVashti
4 months agoDonte
4 months agoLavera
4 months agoEdmond
5 months agoJosephine
5 months agoHelaine
4 months agoRochell
5 months agoKristin
5 months agoJuan
5 months agoReid
5 months agoDulce
5 months agoDorthy
4 months agoChrista
4 months agoDetra
5 months agoDaniel
5 months agoJesus
5 months agoAlita
5 months ago