Cyber Monday 2024! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

SAP Exam C_C4H56I_34 Topic 1 Question 17 Discussion

Actual exam question for SAP's C_C4H56I_34 exam
Question #: 17
Topic #: 1
[All C_C4H56I_34 Questions]

You have determined that one of your products has a known fault. You want to ensure that all cases

with that product are automatically assigned to the escalation team. Which feature in SAP Service

Cloud Version 2 would you use to do this?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

Contribute your Thoughts:

Junita
4 months ago
Ooh, I bet it's C) SLA! That way you can set up a super-fast response time for cases with the known fault. Gotta love those SLAs!
upvoted 0 times
Dortha
3 months ago
Yeah, setting up SLAs for those cases would definitely help prioritize them for the escalation team.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jettie
4 months ago
I think you're right, C) SLA would be the best option to ensure quick response for cases with the known fault.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Callie
4 months ago
I see your point, Merilyn. Case routing would ensure all cases with the known fault are handled properly.
upvoted 0 times
...
Merilyn
4 months ago
That's true, Notifications could work too, but I still think Case routing is the best choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Julie
4 months ago
But wouldn't Notifications also be a good option for alerting the escalation team?
upvoted 0 times
...
Chanel
4 months ago
I'm going with B) Case routing. It's the only option that directly addresses the need to automatically assign cases to a specific team.
upvoted 0 times
Gail
3 months ago
B) Case routing is definitely the feature we need to use to make sure all cases with the known fault product go to the escalation team.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marcos
4 months ago
I think B) Case routing is the most efficient way to ensure all cases with the faulty product are escalated appropriately.
upvoted 0 times
...
Josephine
4 months ago
I agree with you, B) Case routing seems like the best option for automatically assigning cases to the escalation team.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Callie
4 months ago
I agree with Merilyn, Case routing makes the most sense for automatically assigning cases.
upvoted 0 times
...
Paola
4 months ago
Haha, D) Service categories? What is this, a trick question? Obviously, you'd use case routing to handle this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tamra
5 months ago
Hmm, I'm not sure. Could it be C) SLA? Maybe you can set up an SLA that triggers the escalation team when a certain condition is met.
upvoted 0 times
Casey
3 months ago
Let's try using SLA to ensure all cases with the faulty product go to the escalation team.
upvoted 0 times
...
Peggie
3 months ago
I agree, setting up an SLA rule seems like the way to go for this situation.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kenneth
3 months ago
I think you're right. SLA can help automate the assignment to the escalation team.
upvoted 0 times
...
Desmond
4 months ago
That's a good point! SLA could be the feature to use for this.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Leana
5 months ago
I think the answer is B) Case routing. That seems like the most logical way to automatically assign cases with a known fault to the escalation team.
upvoted 0 times
Zoila
4 months ago
It's definitely the most efficient way to handle those cases and make sure they get the attention they need.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lonny
4 months ago
Yes, that feature allows for automatic assignment based on specific criteria like product faults.
upvoted 0 times
...
Thaddeus
4 months ago
I agree, B) Case routing would be the best option to ensure all cases with the faulty product are escalated.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Merilyn
5 months ago
I think the feature we would use is Case routing.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77