Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

SAP Exam C_C4H56I_34 Topic 2 Question 6 Discussion

Actual exam question for SAP's C_C4H56I_34 exam
Question #: 6
Topic #: 2
[All C_C4H56I_34 Questions]

What options are available to automatically assign an employee or team to a case? Note: There are 2 correct answers to this question.

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B, C

Contribute your Thoughts:

Crissy
4 months ago
I'm just imagining someone trying to use BRF+ for this... 'Excuse me, sir, do you have a moment to talk about our Lord and Savior, the Business Rules Framework?'
upvoted 0 times
Nakita
3 months ago
B) Set up rule(s) for case routing to employees.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nakita
4 months ago
A) Define case types and assign responsible teams and employees.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Leslie
4 months ago
That's a good point, Leonor. Option B can be another valid choice for assigning employees to cases automatically.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leonor
4 months ago
I believe option B is also correct, setting up rules for case routing to employees can streamline the process.
upvoted 0 times
...
Roxane
4 months ago
I agree with Leslie, option A seems like the right choice for automatically assigning employees to cases.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gussie
4 months ago
I can't believe anyone would even consider D. That's like using a sledgehammer to crack a nut. A, B, and C are the clear winners here.
upvoted 0 times
Rolf
4 months ago
C) Set up rule(s) for case routing to teams.
upvoted 0 times
...
Latia
4 months ago
B) Set up rule(s) for case routing to employees.
upvoted 0 times
...
Louisa
4 months ago
A) Define case types and assign responsible teams and employees.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Leslie
5 months ago
I think option A is correct because we can define case types and assign employees or teams accordingly.
upvoted 0 times
...
Delmy
5 months ago
This is a no-brainer! A and C are the way to go. Gotta love those automated case assignment rules.
upvoted 0 times
...
Laquanda
5 months ago
Hmm, I'm not sure about D. Isn't BRF+ a bit heavy-handed for case routing? I'd stick with A, B, and C.
upvoted 0 times
Virgina
4 months ago
Definitely, setting up rules for case routing to employees and teams is the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
Helaine
4 months ago
Yeah, I think A, B, and C are more straightforward options.
upvoted 0 times
...
Blondell
4 months ago
Yeah, I think A, B, and C are the more straightforward options.
upvoted 0 times
...
Hector
4 months ago
Definitely, A, B, and C are more straightforward options for assigning employees or teams to cases.
upvoted 0 times
...
Hector
4 months ago
I agree, BRF+ might be too complex for case routing.
upvoted 0 times
...
Arthur
4 months ago
I agree, BRF+ might be too complex for case routing.
upvoted 0 times
...
Graciela
5 months ago
I agree, D does seem a bit complex for case routing.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Sommer
5 months ago
In my opinion, D might be relevant if we are using BRF+ for complex routing scenarios. It could be one of the correct answers.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lavonda
5 months ago
I agree with Valentin. B and C seem like the logical choices here. BRF+ is overkill for something this straightforward.
upvoted 0 times
Venita
5 months ago
I agree, setting up rules for case routing to employees and teams makes sense.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Noelia
5 months ago
I'm not sure about D, setting up rules with BRF+. Can anyone explain that?
upvoted 0 times
...
Edda
6 months ago
I believe C could also be a correct option, setting up rules for routing to teams.
upvoted 0 times
...
Valentin
6 months ago
A and C are definitely the correct answers. Automatically assigning cases to teams and employees is a must-have feature for any case management system.
upvoted 0 times
...
Yolando
6 months ago
I agree with Dong, defining case types and setting up rules for routing to employees makes sense.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dong
6 months ago
I think A and B are the correct answers.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77