Cyber Monday 2024! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

SAP Exam C_C4H62_2408 Topic 8 Question 5 Discussion

Actual exam question for SAP's C_C4H62_2408 exam
Question #: 5
Topic #: 8
[All C_C4H62_2408 Questions]

What are the two best-practice options to configure this? Note: There are 2 correct answers to this question .

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B, D

Contribute your Thoughts:

Jettie
2 months ago
B and D, no doubt. I mean, if the question says there are two correct answers, it's probably not going to be the ones that sound like they were made up on the spot.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alberta
2 months ago
Wait, there's a dataflow scheduler in the Console? I thought that was just a place to store our cat GIFs. This exam is getting way too technical for my taste.
upvoted 0 times
...
Bulah
2 months ago
Hmm, I'm going with A and D. Who needs the console when you can just use the API? Plus, the idx.setDataflow endpoint sounds like it could be fun to play with.
upvoted 0 times
Starr
1 months ago
I agree with you, A and D seem like the best options. The API can be more efficient and the idx.setDataflow endpoint could provide some useful functionality.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jolanda
1 months ago
I prefer B and C actually. The console can be helpful for troubleshooting and the idx.setDataflow endpoint may not be necessary for this configuration.
upvoted 0 times
...
Daniel
1 months ago
I think A and D are good choices too. Using the API can definitely save time and the idx.setDataflow endpoint does sound interesting.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Kristian
2 months ago
I think B and C are the way to go. The console's scheduler is the easiest, but using an extension to schedule the dataflow could give you more control.
upvoted 0 times
Arletta
29 days ago
B and C seem to be the popular choices for configuring this, each with its own advantages.
upvoted 0 times
...
Virgie
1 months ago
I prefer the console's scheduler for its simplicity, but having more control with an extension could be beneficial.
upvoted 0 times
...
Joanna
1 months ago
I think using the console's scheduler is simpler, but using an extension for more control sounds like a good idea.
upvoted 0 times
...
Trinidad
2 months ago
I agree, B and C are definitely the best options for configuring this.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Howard
3 months ago
B and D seem like the best options to me. Using the console's dataflow scheduler and the createScheduling endpoint would be the most straightforward way to configure this.
upvoted 0 times
Lindsey
2 months ago
It's important to choose the best-practice options for optimal configuration.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kami
2 months ago
The createScheduling endpoint is definitely a straightforward way to configure this.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sarah
2 months ago
I think using the console's dataflow scheduler would be the most efficient.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cecil
2 months ago
I agree, B and D are the best options for configuring this.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Trina
3 months ago
That's a valid point, Caprice. Both options A and B have their merits.
upvoted 0 times
...
Caprice
3 months ago
I prefer option A because using an API call to set the dataflow seems more efficient to me.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ilona
3 months ago
I agree with Trina, option B seems like a straightforward way to configure this.
upvoted 0 times
...
Trina
3 months ago
I think option B is a good choice because it allows you to schedule the dataflow easily.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77