Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

SAP Exam C_CPI_2404 Topic 3 Question 1 Discussion

Contribute your Thoughts:

Lisha
4 months ago
D. S{body.in} for sure. It's the only one that makes sense to me. Although, maybe I should double-check the docs just to be safe. You never know with these trick questions!
upvoted 0 times
Jenise
3 months ago
D. S{body.in} for sure. It's the only one that makes sense to me. Although, maybe I should double-check the docs just to be safe. You never know with these trick questions!
upvoted 0 times
...
Boris
3 months ago
D) S{body.in}
upvoted 0 times
...
Willow
3 months ago
C) S{in body)
upvoted 0 times
...
Kenneth
3 months ago
B) S[bodyin]
upvoted 0 times
...
Billi
4 months ago
A) S(inbody)
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Nobuko
4 months ago
Hmm, I'm not sure. C. S{in body) seems a bit awkward, but I could be wrong. Time to brush up on my Content Modifier syntax!
upvoted 0 times
...
Lyla
5 months ago
B. S[bodyin] looks good to me. It's clear and concise.
upvoted 0 times
Frederick
4 months ago
Great, let's go with S[bodyin] then.
upvoted 0 times
...
Maile
4 months ago
Yes, I agree. It's clear and concise.
upvoted 0 times
...
Zona
4 months ago
I think S[bodyin] is the correct notation to call the message body.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Emmanuel
5 months ago
Alright, let's finalize our answers soon. A clear choice will help us move on.
upvoted 0 times
...
Eliseo
5 months ago
S[bodyin] seems less common to me. I'm leaning towards S(inbody) as it’s straightforward.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nieves
5 months ago
I think it's D. S{body.in} seems like the most straightforward way to access the message body of the previous Content Modifier.
upvoted 0 times
Carey
4 months ago
Thanks for the explanation, now I know the correct notation to use in that scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alison
4 months ago
I'll make sure to remember that it's A) S(inbody) for calling the message body of the previous Content Modifier.
upvoted 0 times
...
Enola
4 months ago
Yeah, it can be tricky to remember all the different notations. But once you get the hang of it, it becomes easier.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lynelle
4 months ago
I always get confused with these notations. It's good to know the correct one to use.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lindy
4 months ago
I see, thanks for clarifying. I thought it was D) S{body.in} as well.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shayne
4 months ago
No, it's actually A) S(inbody). That notation is used to call the message body of the previous Content Modifier.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leonida
5 months ago
I think it's D. S{body.in} seems like the most straightforward way to access the message body of the previous Content Modifier.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Mammie
6 months ago
Hmm, S{body.in} does seem familiar, but I’ve read about S[bodyin] somewhere.
upvoted 0 times
...
Emmanuel
6 months ago
I'm not so sure. I believe it's S{body.in}. It looks most like other notations.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rolande
6 months ago
I think it's S(inbody). That's how we usually call the previous message body.
upvoted 0 times
...
Virgie
6 months ago
This question feels a bit tricky. Any idea what the right notation is?
upvoted 0 times
...
Leonor
6 months ago
I'm pretty sure it's C) S{in body).
upvoted 0 times
...
Lino
6 months ago
No, I believe it's A) S(inbody).
upvoted 0 times
...
Joesph
6 months ago
I think the correct notation is D) S{body.in}.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77