Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location PL
Mob_nav_barsMENU

SAP Exam C_CPI_2404 Topic 5 Question 21 Discussion

Actual exam question for SAP's C_CPI_2404 exam
Question #: 21
Topic #: 5
[All C_CPI_2404 Questions]

You want to build an architecture that is largely asynchronous. Which design do you use to exchange notifications between the partners involved?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

You can use an OData adapter to implement a synchronous call to a remote HTTP API as an integration flow component. An OData adapter allows you to send and receive messages using the OData protocol. OData stands for Open Data Protocol and is a standard for exposing and consuming data over HTTP or HTTPS. You can use an OData adapter to communicate with OData services that support CRUD (Create, Read, Update, Delete) operations on resources.Reference:Integration Software | SAP Integration Suite,Modernize Integration with SAP Integration Suite | openSAP


by Meaghan at Sep 14, 2024, 01:55 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium C_CPI_2404 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel
Mozell
15 days ago
Event-driven design? Psh, what is this, amateur hour? Real architects use quantum entanglement to transmit notifications. Get with the times, people!
upvoted 0 times
...
Fannie
20 days ago
Request-driven design? What is this, the 90s? We're talking about asynchronous architecture here, folks. Event-driven is the clear winner.
upvoted 0 times
Vallie
2 days ago
Event-driven design is definitely the way to go for asynchronous architecture.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Denna
22 days ago
I'm not sure, but I think C) Serverless design could also work for exchanging notifications.
upvoted 0 times
...
Bethanie
23 days ago
Serverless, huh? That's an interesting idea, but I'm not sure it's the best fit for notification exchange. Seems a bit overkill.
upvoted 0 times
Pansy
1 days ago
D) Request-driven design
upvoted 0 times
...
Catarina
7 days ago
C) Serverless design
upvoted 0 times
...
Cortney
13 days ago
B) Hexagonal design
upvoted 0 times
...
Eveline
15 days ago
A) Event-driven design
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Kristofer
25 days ago
I agree with Frederica, event-driven design is the best choice for asynchronous architecture.
upvoted 0 times
...
Frederica
27 days ago
I think the answer is A) Event-driven design.
upvoted 0 times
...
Annamaria
29 days ago
Hexagonal design? Really? That's more for managing different interfaces, not notifications. Come on, people, let's get serious here.
upvoted 0 times
Hollis
7 days ago
D) Request-driven design
upvoted 0 times
...
Cecily
15 days ago
C) Serverless design
upvoted 0 times
...
Earleen
24 days ago
A) Event-driven design
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Tenesha
1 months ago
Event-driven design is definitely the way to go for an asynchronous architecture. You get all the benefits of decoupling and scalability.
upvoted 0 times
Willow
14 days ago
True, serverless design can be a cost-effective and efficient way to handle notifications in an asynchronous system.
upvoted 0 times
...
Brent
16 days ago
I think serverless design could also be a good option for exchanging notifications in an asynchronous architecture.
upvoted 0 times
...
Quiana
22 days ago
I agree, event-driven design allows for better scalability and flexibility in handling notifications.
upvoted 0 times
...
Velda
24 days ago
Event-driven design is definitely the way to go for an asynchronous architecture. You get all the benefits of decoupling and scalability.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alida
1 months ago
I agree, it allows for decoupling and scalability.
upvoted 0 times
...
Andra
1 months ago
Event-driven design is the best choice for asynchronous architecture.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77