New Year Sale ! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

SAP Exam C_FSM_2211 Topic 3 Question 16 Discussion

Actual exam question for SAP's C_FSM_2211 exam
Question #: 16
Topic #: 3
[All C_FSM_2211 Questions]

Which of the following reports will face a hard stop when you generate it in SAP Field Service Management?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

Contribute your Thoughts:

Yong
6 months ago
Ah, the age-old question of 'which report will make my computer cry?'. I'm going with option D, the 1500-page spare parts list. It's like trying to print the entire internet on paper. Good luck with that one, IT team!
upvoted 0 times
Allene
4 months ago
B: I agree, that report would definitely cause a hard stop.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ronnie
4 months ago
A: Definitely option D, that spare parts list sounds like a nightmare.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Ozell
6 months ago
Yeah, but I still think 21 DTOs are too complex for the system to handle.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kirk
6 months ago
Hmm, isn't the nightly activity list with 250 seconds of execution time also too long?
upvoted 0 times
...
Shawna
6 months ago
Option A for the win! 21 DTOs? That's like having a family reunion in your database. No wonder it's gonna hit a hard stop. I wonder if they have a special 'Escape the DTOs' mode in the FSM system.
upvoted 0 times
Roosevelt
5 months ago
Roosevelt is right, that report is definitely going to hit a hard stop.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kirby
5 months ago
Option A for the win! 21 DTOs? That's like having a family reunion in your database.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Donte
6 months ago
I thought the spare parts list with 1500 pages would definitely hit a hard stop.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tennie
6 months ago
That could be it, but 1000 records in a service call summary sounds like a lot too.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dana
6 months ago
I'd say option C is the winner here. A 250-second report execution time? That's way too long. It's like watching paint dry, but with more lines of code. I bet the business rules team could use some optimization tips.
upvoted 0 times
...
Daniela
6 months ago
Hmm, I'm not sure. Option D seems like the obvious choice, with 1500 pages for a spare parts list. That's gotta be a nightmare to generate. Although, option A with 21 DTOs could also be problematic. I guess it depends on how the system handles those large reports.
upvoted 0 times
Callie
5 months ago
Yeah, that sounds like a lot of data to process. Option A with 21 DTOs could also be a challenge though.
upvoted 0 times
...
Raina
6 months ago
I think option D with 1500 pages would definitely cause a hard stop.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gerald
6 months ago
Yeah, that's a lot of pages to generate for a spare parts list.
upvoted 0 times
...
Denae
6 months ago
C) A nightly activity list report generated via business rules that executes in 250 seconds
upvoted 0 times
...
Caitlin
6 months ago
Yeah, that could definitely cause a hard stop.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lemuel
6 months ago
I think option D with 1500 pages would definitely cause a hard stop.
upvoted 0 times
...
France
6 months ago
A) A report that references 21 different DTOs
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Tamala
7 months ago
I'm going with option B. A report that returns 1000 records sounds like it could hit a hard stop. Who needs that many service calls in a summary anyway? Maybe they should break it down by day or something.
upvoted 0 times
Elvera
6 months ago
Yeah, that's true. Maybe breaking it down by day would be more manageable.
upvoted 0 times
...
Vernell
6 months ago
I think option B is a good choice. 1000 records is a lot for a summary.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Ozell
7 months ago
Yeah, I'm not sure. I think it might be the report with 21 DTOs.
upvoted 0 times
...
Arlette
7 months ago
Did you see the question about the hard stop in SAP Field Service Management?
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77