Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

SAP Exam C_GRCAC_13 Topic 5 Question 22 Discussion

Actual exam question for SAP's C_GRCAC_13 exam
Question #: 22
Topic #: 5
[All C_GRCAC_13 Questions]

How can you ensure that a coordinator has the opportunity to review UAR request assignments?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer

Contribute your Thoughts:

Cherry
4 months ago
That's true, Stanton. Option C could work as well, but I still think option A is the most secure choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Stanton
4 months ago
But what about option C) Set the Who are the reviewers? parameter for UAR to COORDINATOR? That could also give the coordinator a chance to review assignments.
upvoted 0 times
...
Bulah
4 months ago
This question is making my head spin. I need to grab a coffee and clear my mind before attempting it again.
upvoted 0 times
Allene
3 months ago
B) Schedule the Generate new request for UAR rejected request job
upvoted 0 times
...
Micheline
3 months ago
A) Maintain the GRAC_COORDINATOR agent at the approval stage in MSMP Process ID SAP GRAC_USER_ACCESS_REVIEW
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Mozell
4 months ago
I agree with Cherry, having the coordinator agent at the approval stage seems like the most direct way to ensure review.
upvoted 0 times
...
Eden
4 months ago
How about a trick question where the answer is 'All of the above'? That would really keep us on our toes!
upvoted 0 times
Carla
4 months ago
C) Set the Who are the reviewers? parameter for UAR to COORDINATOR
upvoted 0 times
...
Ronny
4 months ago
B) Schedule the Generate new request for UAR rejected request job
upvoted 0 times
...
Bambi
4 months ago
A) Maintain the GRAC_COORDINATOR agent at the approval stage in MSMP Process ID SAP GRAC_USER_ACCESS_REVIEW
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Marvel
4 months ago
Hmm, I'm not sure. I was thinking option B, but now I'm second-guessing myself. Maybe I need to review the material again.
upvoted 0 times
Glory
4 months ago
C) Set the Who are the reviewers? parameter for UAR to COORDINATOR
upvoted 0 times
...
Lindsey
4 months ago
B) Schedule the Generate new request for UAR rejected request job
upvoted 0 times
...
Suzan
4 months ago
A) Maintain the GRAC_COORDINATOR agent at the approval stage in MSMP Process ID SAP GRAC_USER_ACCESS_REVIEW
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Cherry
5 months ago
I think the answer is A) Maintain the GRAC_COORDINATOR agent at the approval stage in MSMP Process ID SAP GRAC_USER_ACCESS_REVIEW.
upvoted 0 times
...
Niesha
5 months ago
That's true, Harrison. Option C could work as well, but I still think option A is the most secure choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sharen
5 months ago
Option D also sounds good. Setting the 'Admin review required before sending tasks to reviewers' parameter to YES will make sure the coordinator reviews the requests before they go to the reviewers.
upvoted 0 times
Arthur
4 months ago
I agree, Option D is also important. Setting the 'Admin review required before sending tasks to reviewers' parameter to YES will add an extra layer of review by the coordinator.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mozelle
4 months ago
D) Set the Admin review required before sending tasks to reviewers parameter for UAR to YES
upvoted 0 times
...
Aileen
4 months ago
Option A seems like the best choice. Keeping the GRAC_COORDINATOR agent at the approval stage will ensure they have the opportunity to review UAR request assignments.
upvoted 0 times
...
Peter
4 months ago
C) Set the Who are the reviewers? parameter for UAR to COORDINATOR
upvoted 0 times
...
Shantell
4 months ago
A) Maintain the GRAC_COORDINATOR agent at the approval stage in MSMP Process ID SAP GRAC_USER_ACCESS_REVIEW
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Harrison
5 months ago
But what about option C) Set the Who are the reviewers? parameter for UAR to COORDINATOR? That could also give the coordinator a chance to review assignments.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dyan
5 months ago
I think option C is the correct answer. Setting the 'Who are the reviewers?' parameter to COORDINATOR will ensure the coordinator has the opportunity to review the UAR request assignments.
upvoted 0 times
Denise
4 months ago
I agree, setting the parameter to COORDINATOR is the way to go for reviewing UAR requests.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dana
4 months ago
Option C is indeed the correct answer. It ensures the coordinator can review the assignments.
upvoted 0 times
...
Vivan
5 months ago
Yes, setting the 'Who are the reviewers?' parameter to COORDINATOR is the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ammie
5 months ago
I agree, option C is the best choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Shawnna
5 months ago
I agree with Niesha, having the coordinator agent at the approval stage seems like the most direct way to ensure review.
upvoted 0 times
...
Niesha
6 months ago
I think the answer is A) Maintain the GRAC_COORDINATOR agent at the approval stage in MSMP Process ID SAP GRAC_USER_ACCESS_REVIEW.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77