Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

SAP Exam C_HCMP_2311 Topic 5 Question 17 Discussion

Actual exam question for SAP's C_HCMP_2311 exam
Question #: 17
Topic #: 5
[All C_HCMP_2311 Questions]

Which operations would you use in a personnel calculation rule (PCR) called by function PIT (Process the IT table) to reduce the amount of a wage type by 10% and also retain it for further processing?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

Contribute your Thoughts:

Victor
2 months ago
Ah, the age-old question of how to reduce a wage type by 10% and still keep it for more fun. I'm feeling lucky, so I'm picking C!
upvoted 0 times
Vincent
29 days ago
User4: I agree with User1, A) AMT 0.90 ADDWT* seems right
upvoted 0 times
...
Nguyet
1 months ago
User3: I'm going with B) AMT* 0.90 ADDWTI
upvoted 0 times
...
Yolande
1 months ago
User2: I believe it's D) AMT 0.10 ADDWTI*
upvoted 0 times
...
Ronnie
2 months ago
User1: I think the correct option is A) AMT 0.90 ADDWT*
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Teri
3 months ago
Haha, I bet the answer is a trick question and none of these options are correct! But if I had to choose, I'd go with D just to be different.
upvoted 0 times
Ben
2 months ago
I agree, let's go with D and see if it's the right one.
upvoted 0 times
...
Fabiola
2 months ago
I think D is the correct answer, it seems like the most logical choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lynelle
2 months ago
I'm going with C) AMT 0.10 ADDWT*
upvoted 0 times
...
Oretha
2 months ago
No, I believe it's B) AMT* 0.90 ADDWTI
upvoted 0 times
...
Xenia
2 months ago
I think the answer is A) AMT 0.90 ADDWT*
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Stevie
3 months ago
I believe D) AMT 0.10 ADDWTI* is incorrect because it adds the wage type instead of reducing it
upvoted 0 times
...
Roxanne
3 months ago
I'm not sure, but I think C) AMT 0.10 ADDWT* might also work to reduce the amount by 10%
upvoted 0 times
...
Clare
3 months ago
I agree with Antonio, A) AMT 0.90 ADDWT* makes sense to reduce the amount by 10%
upvoted 0 times
...
Cherelle
3 months ago
I'm going with B. Multiplying the wage type by 0.90 to reduce it by 10% and then using ADDWTI to retain it for further processing seems logical.
upvoted 0 times
Pamella
2 months ago
User4: B it is then, let's stick with that.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gabriele
2 months ago
User3: I would go with B as well, seems like the right choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rosita
2 months ago
User2: I agree, multiplying by 0.90 and using ADDWTI makes sense.
upvoted 0 times
...
Velda
2 months ago
User1: I think B is the correct option.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Angella
3 months ago
Option A looks like the right choice to me. Reducing the wage type by 10% and retaining it for further processing seems to be exactly what the question is asking for.
upvoted 0 times
Robt
3 months ago
I'm not sure, but option D looks like it could work by reducing the amount by 10% and then adding it with the wage type for further processing.
upvoted 0 times
...
Vanesa
3 months ago
I think option B might be a better choice, multiplying the amount by 0.90 and then adding it with the wage type for further processing.
upvoted 0 times
...
Delsie
3 months ago
I agree, option A seems to be the correct choice for reducing the wage type by 10% and retaining it for further processing.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Antonio
3 months ago
I think the correct answer is A) AMT 0.90 ADDWT*
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77