Cyber Monday 2024! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

SAP Exam C_IBP_2311 Topic 5 Question 28 Discussion

Actual exam question for SAP's C_IBP_2311 exam
Question #: 28
Topic #: 5
[All C_IBP_2311 Questions]

You have set up a planning area, and data is now available. You adjust the necessary time profile settings and run a consistency check Which settings can you change and still run a successful consistency check? Note: There are 2 correct answers to this question

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C, D

Contribute your Thoughts:

Maira
2 months ago
I'm going with B) and C) as well. Changing the hierarchy and horizons seems like the way to go without causing any issues.
upvoted 0 times
Dante
22 days ago
Definitely, those settings are less likely to cause any problems during the consistency check.
upvoted 0 times
...
Monte
1 months ago
I would go with B) and C) as well. It's better to be safe when making changes.
upvoted 0 times
...
Barrie
1 months ago
I agree, changing the numbering hierarchy and the past and future horizons seems like the best approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
Germaine
1 months ago
I think B) and C) are the safest options to change without causing any issues.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Leontine
2 months ago
I agree with Fletcher. B) and C) sound like the most logical choices here. Gotta love those tricky consistency check questions!
upvoted 0 times
...
Lonny
2 months ago
Ha! Adding a new time profile level? That's like trying to fix a flat tire by putting on a new spare. Definitely not the right answer.
upvoted 0 times
Catina
1 months ago
B) Change the numbering hierarchy of the period IDS in the time profile.
upvoted 0 times
...
Hayley
1 months ago
A) Add a new time profile level to the time profile
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Carla
2 months ago
Hmm, I'm not sure about D) changing the description of the attribute. That seems like it shouldn't affect the consistency check.
upvoted 0 times
...
Emeline
2 months ago
Changing the numbering hierarchy of the period IDS might cause issues. We should avoid that.
upvoted 0 times
...
Fletcher
2 months ago
I think the correct answers are B) and C). Changing the numbering hierarchy and the past and future horizon should not affect the consistency check.
upvoted 0 times
Kate
1 months ago
It's good to know which settings we can change without affecting the overall process. Thanks for pointing that out.
upvoted 0 times
...
Aretha
1 months ago
I believe we can safely adjust those settings without causing any issues with the consistency check.
upvoted 0 times
...
Misty
1 months ago
I think you're right. Those settings are not critical for the consistency check to run successfully.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leoma
1 months ago
It's good to know which settings we can adjust without causing issues with the consistency check.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shay
1 months ago
I think you're right. Those settings are not critical for the consistency check to run successfully.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dalene
2 months ago
I agree, changing the numbering hierarchy and the past and future horizon should not impact the consistency check.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dong
2 months ago
I agree, changing the numbering hierarchy and the past and future horizon should not impact the consistency check.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Nan
2 months ago
I agree with Graham. We can also add a new time profile level.
upvoted 0 times
...
Graham
3 months ago
I think we can change the past and future horizon of the level in the time profile.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77