Independence Day Deal! Unlock 25% OFF Today – Limited-Time Offer - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

SAP Exam C_MDG_1909 Topic 10 Question 88 Discussion

Actual exam question for SAP's C_MDG_1909 exam
Question #: 88
Topic #: 10
[All C_MDG_1909 Questions]

What options are possible for non-SAP HANA-based standardization for SAP Master Data Governance consolidation? Note: There are 2 correct answers to this question.

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

Contribute your Thoughts:

Gail
1 months ago
In the world of SAP, the only thing more confusing than the options is the price tag. But hey, at least we can all agree on B and D, right?
upvoted 0 times
Ricki
10 days ago
Yes, I agree. Those are the two possible options for SAP Master Data Governance consolidation.
upvoted 0 times
...
Elvera
13 days ago
I think B and D are the correct options for non-SAP HANA-based standardization.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Glendora
2 months ago
Ah, the age-old question of SAP standardization. B and D are the clear winners here. Now, if only I could find a way to automate my lunch order...
upvoted 0 times
Bettye
19 days ago
SAP Data Services through BAS interface sounds like a good option for standardization.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ronnie
28 days ago
Automation is key! Maybe you can use BRFplus for your lunch order?
upvoted 0 times
...
Kindra
1 months ago
I agree, B and D are definitely the way to go for non-SAP HANA-based standardization.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Mozelle
2 months ago
Haha, deleting or splitting records? That's a bold move, A! But I'll have to go with the more reliable options, B and D.
upvoted 0 times
Berry
19 days ago
Definitely, we don't want to risk losing important data with option A.
upvoted 0 times
...
Vicky
27 days ago
Yeah, I agree with you. B and D seem like the safer choices.
upvoted 0 times
...
Noel
1 months ago
D) SAP Data Services, called using BAS interface (BusinessPartner model only)
upvoted 0 times
...
Margurite
2 months ago
B) Validation of records against back end customizing
upvoted 0 times
...
Trina
2 months ago
A) Deletion or splitting of single or multiple records.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Novella
2 months ago
Hmm, C seems intriguing, but I'm not sure it's the best choice here. I think B and D are the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nakisha
2 months ago
I'd go with B and D. Validating records against the backend customizing is a must, and using SAP Data Services for standardization seems like a solid option.
upvoted 0 times
Lashanda
1 months ago
Using SAP Data Services for standardization is a good choice, it provides a reliable solution.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lashanda
1 months ago
I agree, validating records against backend customizing is crucial for standardization.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Marva
2 months ago
I'm not sure about option B and D. Can someone explain why they are not correct answers?
upvoted 0 times
...
Barrie
2 months ago
I agree with you, Joesph. Option A involves deletion or splitting of records, while option C involves standardization using BRFplus.
upvoted 0 times
...
Joesph
2 months ago
I think options A and C are possible for non-SAP HANA-based standardization.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77