Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

SAP Exam C_PO_7517 Topic 7 Question 30 Discussion

Actual exam question for SAP's C_PO_7517 exam
Question #: 30
Topic #: 7
[All C_PO_7517 Questions]

You create an asynchronous scenario. The message sequence must remain identical. Which Quality of Service must you use?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

Contribute your Thoughts:

Brianne
4 months ago
Yeah, EOIO provides both delivery guarantee and order preservation
upvoted 0 times
...
Sena
4 months ago
I don't think BE guarantees the order of messages, so EOIO would be better
upvoted 0 times
...
Buck
5 months ago
But wouldn't Best Effort (BE) be sufficient for this scenario?
upvoted 0 times
...
Miles
5 months ago
A) Best Effort (BE)? More like 'Best of Luck' with that message sequence, amirite? *chuckles*
upvoted 0 times
...
Brianne
5 months ago
I agree with Sena, EOIO ensures the message sequence remains identical
upvoted 0 times
...
Mabel
5 months ago
D) qRFC? Really? What is this, a new Quality of Service option they're testing us on? I think I need to lay off the caffeine...
upvoted 0 times
Willodean
4 months ago
I agree, we should definitely look into what qRFC entails.
upvoted 0 times
...
Elli
4 months ago
Yes, it seems like a new Quality of Service option we should learn about.
upvoted 0 times
...
Venita
4 months ago
I think qRFC is a new option we need to be familiar with.
upvoted 0 times
...
Stephaine
4 months ago
D) qRFC
upvoted 0 times
...
Shawnta
4 months ago
C) Exactly Once in Order (EOIO)
upvoted 0 times
...
Hubert
5 months ago
B) Exactly Once (EO)
upvoted 0 times
...
Tyra
5 months ago
A) Best Effort (BE)
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Kallie
5 months ago
Hmm, I was thinking B) Exactly Once (EO), but now I'm not so sure. This is a tricky one.
upvoted 0 times
Gary
4 months ago
I agree, C) Exactly Once in Order (EOIO) ensures that messages are delivered in the order they were sent.
upvoted 0 times
...
Natalya
4 months ago
I think C) Exactly Once in Order (EOIO) would be the best choice for this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shenika
4 months ago
I agree, C) Exactly Once in Order (EOIO) ensures that messages are delivered in the order they were sent.
upvoted 0 times
...
Luis
4 months ago
I agree, C) Exactly Once in Order (EOIO) ensures the messages are processed in the correct order.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cassandra
4 months ago
I think C) Exactly Once in Order (EOIO) would be the best choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Edwin
5 months ago
I think C) Exactly Once in Order (EOIO) would be the best choice for this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Sena
5 months ago
I think we should use Exactly Once in Order (EOIO) for this scenario
upvoted 0 times
...
Edwin
5 months ago
That's true, David, qRFC can also be a reliable choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Vincenza
5 months ago
I think qRFC could also be a good option for ensuring message sequence.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lenna
5 months ago
I see your point, but EOIO provides stronger guarantees.
upvoted 0 times
...
Chauncey
5 months ago
But wouldn't Best Effort (BE) be sufficient for an asynchronous scenario?
upvoted 0 times
...
An
6 months ago
C) Exactly Once in Order (EOIO) seems like the obvious choice here. Gotta keep that message sequence intact, am I right?
upvoted 0 times
...
Edwin
6 months ago
I agree with EOIO ensures the message sequence remains identical.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lenna
6 months ago
I think we should use Exactly Once in Order (EOIO) for this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77