Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

SAP Exam C_S4CPR_2408 Topic 1 Question 5 Discussion

Actual exam question for SAP's C_S4CPR_2408 exam
Question #: 5
Topic #: 1
[All C_S4CPR_2408 Questions]

How is the KP! Contract leakage percentage defined?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

Contribute your Thoughts:

Jeffrey
16 days ago
A is the answer, obviously. Who would make a purchase order without a contract? Probably the same people who forget to put on pants in the morning.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lina
17 days ago
This question is as clear as mud. I'm just going to go with C and hope for the best.
upvoted 0 times
...
Galen
18 days ago
B is the answer. It's the only one that specifically mentions 'contract reference'.
upvoted 0 times
Desirae
6 days ago
B) Confirmed spend of purchase orders with contract reference
upvoted 0 times
...
Irving
8 days ago
A) Spend of purchase orders without contract reference despite existing contract
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Carmelina
19 days ago
I think it could also be D) Quantity of purchase orders without contract reference despite existing contract, as that would indicate potential leakage.
upvoted 0 times
...
Glendora
20 days ago
Hmm, that makes sense. It's important to track spend with contract reference to prevent leakage.
upvoted 0 times
...
Osvaldo
22 days ago
I believe it's actually B) Confirmed spend of purchase orders with contract reference.
upvoted 0 times
...
Glendora
30 days ago
I think the KP! Contract leakage percentage is defined by A) Spend of purchase orders without contract reference despite existing contract.
upvoted 0 times
...
Margurite
1 months ago
Option C, because the quantity of orders is what's important, not the spend. Duh!
upvoted 0 times
Dorinda
11 days ago
C) Confirmed quantity of purchase orders with contract reference
upvoted 0 times
...
Jamal
13 days ago
B) Confirmed spend of purchase orders with contract reference
upvoted 0 times
...
Dustin
20 days ago
A) Spend of purchase orders without contract reference despite existing contract
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Stephen
1 months ago
D is the way to go. Quantity of purchase orders without contract reference is the definition of KP! Contract leakage, right?
upvoted 0 times
Rima
19 hours ago
I agree, D is the most accurate option for defining contract leakage percentage.
upvoted 0 times
...
Twanna
2 days ago
That's right. D is the definition of KP! Contract leakage percentage.
upvoted 0 times
...
Anglea
10 days ago
I think D makes sense too. It's about purchase orders without contract reference.
upvoted 0 times
...
Derick
16 days ago
Yes, you are correct. D is the correct option.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Eliz
2 months ago
I'll go with option B. It mentions 'confirmed spend', so that's probably the right answer.
upvoted 0 times
Hermila
1 months ago
Yes, 'confirmed spend' does seem like the right choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Whitley
1 months ago
I think option B is the correct answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Ling
2 months ago
Option A seems the most logical. Who would make a purchase order without a contract reference?
upvoted 0 times
Herminia
27 days ago
User 1: Option A seems the most logical. Who would make a purchase order without a contract reference?
upvoted 0 times
...
Raymon
27 days ago
User 2: I agree, it doesn't make sense to have purchase orders without contract references.
upvoted 0 times
...
Felice
1 months ago
User 2: I agree, it's important to have that contract reference to ensure everything is in order.
upvoted 0 times
...
Hannah
2 months ago
User 1: Option A does make sense. It would be risky to make a purchase order without a contract reference.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77