Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25%
- Ends In
00:00:00
Coupon code:
SAVE25
X
Welcome to Pass4Success
Login
|
Sign up
-
Free
Preparation Discussions
Mail Us
support@pass4success.com
Location
PL
MENU
Home
Popular vendors
Salesforce
Microsoft
Nutanix
Cisco
Amazon
Google
CompTIA
SAP
VMware
Oracle
Fortinet
PeopleCert
Eccouncil
HP
Palo Alto Networks
Adobe
ServiceNow
Dell EMC
CheckPoint
Linux Foundation
Discount Deals
New
About
Contact
Login
Sign up
Home
Discussions
SAP Discussions
Exam C_S4CPR_2408 Topic 4 Question 11 Discussion
SAP Exam C_S4CPR_2408 Topic 4 Question 11 Discussion
Actual exam question for SAP's C_S4CPR_2408 exam
Question #: 11
Topic #: 4
[All C_S4CPR_2408 Questions]
How is the KP! Contract leakage percentage defined?
A
Spend of purchase orders without contract reference despite existing contract
B
Confirmed spend of purchase orders with contract reference
C
Confirmed quantity of purchase orders with contract reference
D
Quantity of purchase orders without contract reference despite existing contract
Show Suggested Answer
Hide Answer
Suggested Answer:
A
by
Natalya
at
Sep 13, 2024, 09:29 PM
Limited Time Offer
25%
Off
Get Premium C_S4CPR_2408 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF
Contribute your Thoughts:
Submit
Cancel
Arlette
14 days ago
I'm just going to go with C. Quantity of orders with contract reference. Seems the most straightforward definition.
upvoted
0
times
...
Fidelia
21 days ago
I believe it's important to track the spend without contract reference to identify any potential leakage and improve contract compliance.
upvoted
0
times
...
Rhea
21 days ago
Haha, I bet the contract leakage is due to all the holes in the KP! Contract. Swiss cheese, anyone?
upvoted
0
times
...
Ashton
22 days ago
B seems right. The confirmed spend of orders with contract reference is a good way to measure leakage.
upvoted
0
times
...
Mari
27 days ago
D sounds more like the correct definition to me. Shouldn't it be the quantity of orders without contract reference?
upvoted
0
times
Nobuko
5 days ago
Oh really? I thought it was D) Quantity of purchase orders without contract reference despite existing contract
upvoted
0
times
...
Nathalie
10 days ago
I think it's actually A) Spend of purchase orders without contract reference despite existing contract
upvoted
0
times
...
...
Nicolette
29 days ago
I think the answer is A. It makes sense that contract leakage would be defined as spend without contract reference.
upvoted
0
times
Anglea
6 days ago
I'm not sure, but I think it might be C, confirmed quantity with contract reference.
upvoted
0
times
...
Penney
8 days ago
I think it's B, confirmed spend with contract reference.
upvoted
0
times
...
Lorean
24 days ago
I agree, A seems like the most logical choice.
upvoted
0
times
...
...
Christoper
1 months ago
I agree with Bo, because if there is a contract in place, the spend should be referenced to that contract to avoid leakage.
upvoted
0
times
...
Bo
1 months ago
I think the KP1 Contract leakage percentage is defined by A) Spend of purchase orders without contract reference despite existing contract.
upvoted
0
times
...
Log in to Pass4Success
×
Sign in:
Forgot my password
Log in
Report Comment
×
Is the comment made by
USERNAME
spam or abusive?
Commenting
×
In order to participate in the comments you need to be logged-in.
You can
sign-up
or
login
Save
Cancel
az-700
pass4success
az-104
200-301
200-201
cissp
350-401
350-201
350-501
350-601
350-801
350-901
az-720
az-305
pl-300
Arlette
14 days agoFidelia
21 days agoRhea
21 days agoAshton
22 days agoMari
27 days agoNobuko
5 days agoNathalie
10 days agoNicolette
29 days agoAnglea
6 days agoPenney
8 days agoLorean
24 days agoChristoper
1 months agoBo
1 months ago