New Year Sale ! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

SAP Exam C_S4TM_2020 Topic 1 Question 52 Discussion

Actual exam question for SAP's C_S4TM_2020 exam
Question #: 52
Topic #: 1
[All C_S4TM_2020 Questions]

Which of the following incompatibility types can you use in the Automatic and Manual Planning incompatibility area?

Note: There are 2 correct answers to this question.

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A, D

Contribute your Thoughts:

Nicholle
6 months ago
I'm going with A and B. Can't go wrong with the classics, you know? Though I do wonder if the exam writer was feeling a little mischievous with those other options.
upvoted 0 times
Valentine
5 months ago
Yeah, the other options seemed a bit tricky.
upvoted 0 times
...
Edgar
5 months ago
Good choice, those are the correct answers.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kristel
5 months ago
I agree, the other options seem a bit tricky.
upvoted 0 times
...
Valentin
6 months ago
Yeah, those are the classic choices.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ilona
6 months ago
I think A and B are the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
Doyle
6 months ago
I'm going with A and B.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Teri
6 months ago
This question is tricky. I'll go with A and B then.
upvoted 0 times
...
Merissa
6 months ago
Ha! Carrier and transportation order? That's like trying to mix oil and water. Definitely not a valid incompatibility there.
upvoted 0 times
...
Vicki
6 months ago
Hmm, I'm a little confused. Does 'location (stay level)' even make sense as an incompatibility type? That's a bit of a head-scratcher.
upvoted 0 times
Nieves
6 months ago
B) Transportation request header - Transportation request header
upvoted 0 times
...
Alexia
6 months ago
Yeah, it helps avoid conflicts and optimize the planning process.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nieves
6 months ago
A) Freight unit - Freight booking
upvoted 0 times
...
Lashawnda
6 months ago
I agree, it's important to consider the stay level when planning transportation.
upvoted 0 times
...
Johna
6 months ago
B) Transportation request header - Transportation request header
upvoted 0 times
...
Talia
6 months ago
A) Freight unit - Freight booking
upvoted 0 times
...
Adelina
6 months ago
I think 'location (stay level)' does make sense as an incompatibility type.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Janine
6 months ago
I've read about A and B before. They should be the right answers.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lorriane
7 months ago
Hmmm, I believe D: Vehicle resource - Location (stay level) might be one.
upvoted 0 times
...
Heike
7 months ago
I think A and B are the correct answers. Freight unit and freight booking, as well as transportation request header and transportation request header, seem like logical incompatibility types.
upvoted 0 times
Chaya
6 months ago
Which of the following incompatibility types can you use in the Automatic and Manual Planning incompatibility area?
upvoted 0 times
...
Davida
6 months ago
I think we need to focus on the relationship between the different elements in the incompatibility area.
upvoted 0 times
...
Pedro
6 months ago
Let's review the question again to make sure we understand it correctly.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dorathy
6 months ago
Which of the following incompatibility types can you use in the Automatic and Manual Planning incompatibility area?
upvoted 0 times
...
Melodie
7 months ago
I see your point, but I still think C and D could work.
upvoted 0 times
...
Merri
7 months ago
But A and B make more sense in this context.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alton
7 months ago
No, C and D are not compatible incompatibility types.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rickie
7 months ago
I think C and D are also valid options.
upvoted 0 times
...
Billy
7 months ago
I agree, A and B are the correct answers.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Ivette
7 months ago
I'm leaning toward B: Transportation request header - Transportation request header.
upvoted 0 times
...
Janine
7 months ago
I think one is A: Freight unit - Freight booking.
upvoted 0 times
...
Teri
7 months ago
Anyone knows the answer to the transport incompatibility question?
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77