Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

SAP Exam C_SAC_2415 Topic 3 Question 10 Discussion

Actual exam question for SAP's C_SAC_2415 exam
Question #: 10
Topic #: 3
[All C_SAC_2415 Questions]

You have a dimension with members for product groups and products. Each product group

has associated products. You want to plan by product group without disaggregating into the

products. How can you do this?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

When you have a dimension with members for product groups and associated products and want to plan by product group without disaggregating into the individual products, using two hierarchies is the best approach. One hierarchy can represent the product groups at a higher level, allowing for planning and analysis at the group level. The second hierarchy can include both the product groups and their associated individual products for more detailed analysis when needed. This approach provides flexibility in planning and analyzing data at different levels of detail without the necessity of disaggregating data at the product group level.


SAP Analytics Cloud Help Documentation: Hierarchies in Planning

SAP Analytics Cloud User Guide: Managing Hierarchies for Planning

Contribute your Thoughts:

Ceola
12 days ago
Two hierarchies, huh? Sounds like I need to put on my 'hierarchy hat' for this one. I wonder if they make those in a fashionable shade of data analytics.
upvoted 0 times
...
Allene
23 days ago
Wait, is this a trick question? Dis-abling things sounds like a terrible idea. I'm going with C - use two hierarchies. Keeping it simple is the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rosalind
25 days ago
Hmm, I'm torn between A and C. Maybe I'll just roll a dice to decide. 50/50 chance of getting it right, right?
upvoted 0 times
Samira
3 days ago
User1: Yeah, it will help you plan by product group without disaggregating into the products.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lauryn
8 days ago
User2: I agree, that seems like the best choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Roosevelt
14 days ago
User1: I think you should go with option A) Use two properties.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Alease
1 months ago
I'm not sure, but I think B) Dis-able allocations could also work to plan by product group.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jesse
1 months ago
I agree with Carlene, using two hierarchies makes sense for planning by product group.
upvoted 0 times
...
Blossom
1 months ago
I'm not sure about disabling allocations or distributions. Seems like that would just create more problems down the line. C is the clear winner here.
upvoted 0 times
Martha
7 days ago
C) Use two hierarchies
upvoted 0 times
...
Cornell
16 days ago
B) Dis-able allocations
upvoted 0 times
...
Glenna
1 months ago
A) Use two properties
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Gracie
1 months ago
Option C seems to be the way to go. Using two hierarchies would let me plan at the product group level without getting bogged down in the details of individual products.
upvoted 0 times
Alonso
20 days ago
Yes, it's a good way to keep the focus on the bigger picture without getting lost in the details.
upvoted 0 times
...
Stefany
24 days ago
I agree, using two hierarchies would definitely help with planning at the product group level.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Carlene
1 months ago
I think the answer is C) Use two hierarchies.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77