Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

SAP Exam C_SEN_2305 Topic 8 Question 28 Discussion

Actual exam question for SAP's C_SEN_2305 exam
Question #: 28
Topic #: 8
[All C_SEN_2305 Questions]

How can you address a pre-filtered view of a structure in a published library?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D

Contribute your Thoughts:

Zona
16 days ago
Option B could work, but wouldn't that just bloat the library.html file? I'd prefer a more modular solution.
upvoted 0 times
...
Chauncey
17 days ago
Haha, Option A? Cloning and deleting? What is this, amateur hour? Let's keep it professional, folks.
upvoted 0 times
...
Scarlet
20 days ago
Option C is interesting, but I'm not sure if the author filter would be appropriate for end-users. Might be better to give them more control.
upvoted 0 times
...
Maryann
1 months ago
I'm not sure, but I think B) By adding the end user filter directly to library.html could also be a valid option.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jacklyn
1 months ago
I disagree, I believe the correct answer is C) By activating the author filter and applying it for end users.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jeff
1 months ago
I'm leaning towards Option D. Adding the filter-specific URL infix seems like a more flexible and scalable approach.
upvoted 0 times
Merilyn
8 days ago
It might work, but using the filter-specific URL infix seems like a more direct way to control the view.
upvoted 0 times
...
Bea
11 days ago
But wouldn't activating the author filter and applying it for end users also work?
upvoted 0 times
...
Bernardine
18 days ago
I agree, having a filter-specific URL infix would definitely help in customizing the view.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ilda
29 days ago
Option D sounds like a good choice. It would make it easier to manage different views.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Adaline
1 months ago
I think the answer is A) By cloning the structure and deleting the unwanted duplicates.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lettie
1 months ago
Option B seems like the easiest solution, but I wonder if that would be a good idea from a security standpoint.
upvoted 0 times
Jina
24 days ago
I agree, it's better to be cautious when it comes to security
upvoted 0 times
...
Stephaine
27 days ago
I think option A is safer, cloning the structure gives you more control
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77