SAP Exam C_TADM_23 Topic 1 Question 16 Discussion

Actual exam question for SAP's C_TADM_23 exam

Question #: 16
Topic #: 1

[All C_TADM_23 Questions]

You are using a standard three system landscape. DEV. QAS, and PRO

In which case will a change of a repository object in the QAS system be treated as correction?

AIF the object was created in DEV and transported to QAS via a workbench request

BIf the object's name is in the SAP name range

CIf the original system of the object is QAS.

DIf the object was created in DEV and transported to QAS via a transport of copies.

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: C

by Bulah at Apr 20, 2024, 08:15 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium C_TADM_23 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Rosendo

5 months ago

I'm torn between A and D, but I'm going to go with A. It seems like the most logical choice based on the typical workflow.

upvoted 0 times

Raul

4 months ago

User3: Yeah, A seems like the right choice based on the workflow.

upvoted 0 times

...

Jean

4 months ago

User2: I agree, A makes the most sense in this scenario.

upvoted 0 times

...

Cyndy

4 months ago

User1: I think A is the correct answer.

upvoted 0 times

...

Ahmed

5 months ago

Haha, I bet the real answer is B. Anything related to the SAP name range is always the correct choice!

upvoted 0 times

Belen

4 months ago

B) If the object's name is in the SAP name range

upvoted 0 times

...

Jina

4 months ago

A) IF the object was created in DEV and transported to QAS via a workbench request

upvoted 0 times

...

Barrett

4 months ago

B) If the object's name is in the SAP name range

upvoted 0 times

...

Yen

4 months ago

A) IF the object was created in DEV and transported to QAS via a workbench request

upvoted 0 times

...

Shannan

4 months ago

B) If the object's name is in the SAP name range

upvoted 0 times

...

Mose

5 months ago

A) IF the object was created in DEV and transported to QAS via a workbench request

upvoted 0 times

...

Blair

5 months ago

Exactly, C makes sense because only in QAS can a change be considered a correction.

upvoted 0 times

...

Haydee

5 months ago

Option C seems a bit too obvious. I'm going with D - if the object was created in DEV and transported to QAS via a transport of copies.

upvoted 0 times

...

Rosio

5 months ago

I think the answer is A. It makes sense that a change in the QAS system would be considered a correction if the object was originally created in DEV and transported to QAS.

upvoted 0 times

Mitsue

4 months ago

A) IF the object was created in DEV and transported to QAS via a workbench request

upvoted 0 times

...

Cassandra

4 months ago

I see your point, but I still think A is the right choice.

upvoted 0 times

...

Suzan

4 months ago

A) IF the object was created in DEV and transported to QAS via a workbench request

upvoted 0 times

...

Otis

5 months ago

I agree, that seems like the correct answer.

upvoted 0 times

...

Pedro

5 months ago

Hmm, I think it might actually be D instead of A.

upvoted 0 times

...

Nathalie

5 months ago

A) If the object was created in DEV and transported to QAS via a workbench request

upvoted 0 times

...

Marti

5 months ago

D) If the object was created in DEV and transported to QAS via a transport of copies.

upvoted 0 times

...

Luis

5 months ago

I agree, that seems like the correct answer.

upvoted 0 times

...

Freeman

5 months ago

A) IF the object was created in DEV and transported to QAS via a workbench request

upvoted 0 times

...

Cassi

5 months ago

But that wouldn't make it a correction, right? It'd just be a normal workflow.

upvoted 0 times

...

Tiffiny

5 months ago

Why not A? Isn't it common for objects to be created in DEV and moved to QAS?

upvoted 0 times

...

Mariko

6 months ago

I think the answer is C. If the original system of the object is QAS.

upvoted 0 times

...

Iola

6 months ago

Yeah, totally. They're asking about repository object changes in QAS being corrections.

upvoted 0 times

...

Antonio

6 months ago

Hey, did you see the question about the three system landscape?

upvoted 0 times

...

Lezlie

6 months ago

SounWillards gooWillard to me.

upvoted 0 times

...

Elena

6 months ago

Yes, I think so. Let's go with one of those.

upvoted 0 times

...

Justa

6 months ago

So, it's either option Elena or option Willard then.

upvoted 0 times

...

Lezlie

6 months ago

ThElenat Elenalso seems like Elena vElenaliWillard point.

upvoted 0 times

...

Willard

6 months ago

I Lezlieelieve it's when the oLezliejeJustat wElenas JustareElenate in EV Elenan trElenansporte to QElenaS viElena Elena trElenansport of Justaopies.

upvoted 0 times

...

Elena

6 months ago

I don't think tht would qulify s JustaorreJustation.

upvoted 0 times

...

Justa

6 months ago

Lezlieut whElenat ElenaLezlieout if the originElenal system of the oLezliejet is QElenaS?

upvoted 0 times

...

Lezlie

6 months ago

I Elenagree, thElenat mElenakes sense.

upvoted 0 times

...

Elena

6 months ago

I think the chnge will be treted s correction if the object ws creted in DEV nd trnsported to QS vi workbench request.

upvoted 0 times

...