SAP Exam C_THR81_2405 Topic 4 Question 16 Discussion

Actual exam question for SAP's C_THR81_2405 exam

Question #: 16
Topic #: 4

[All C_THR81_2405 Questions]

What is generic object foTranslation used for in SAP SuccessFactors Employee Central?

ATo translate XML FO field labels

BTo translate any generic object field labels in the instance

CTo translate MDF FO field labels

DTo translate XML and MDF FO field labels

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: C

by Na at Sep 17, 2024, 10:54 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium C_THR81_2405 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Horace

1 months ago

Translating field labels? Sounds like a real page-turner of a task. I hope the exam questions get more exciting than this!

upvoted 0 times

Micheline

13 days ago

D) To translate XML FO field labels

upvoted 0 times

...

Adelina

19 days ago

C) To translate MDF FO field labels

upvoted 0 times

...

Layla

22 days ago

B) To translate any generic object field labels in the instance

upvoted 0 times

...

Cecil

1 months ago

A) To translate XML and MDF FO field labels

upvoted 0 times

...

Cammy

2 months ago

This one's got me stumped. I'm just going to guess and hope for the best.

upvoted 0 times

...

Ashton

2 months ago

I'm feeling lucky with option B! Translating generic object field labels sounds like a nice, broad use case.

upvoted 0 times

...

Beata

2 months ago

I don't know, option A seems a bit too narrow. Why would it only translate XML FO field labels and not anything else?

upvoted 0 times

...

Ty

2 months ago

Hmm, I'm going to go with C on this one. Translating MDF FO field labels seems like the specific purpose of this tool.

upvoted 0 times

Eulah

15 days ago

C is the way to go. Translating MDF FO field labels is a key function of the tool.

upvoted 0 times

...

Sherita

23 days ago

I'm not sure, but C sounds right. Translating MDF FO field labels seems like a common task.

upvoted 0 times

...

Moira

1 months ago

I agree, C makes the most sense. That's what the generic object foTranslation is for.

upvoted 0 times

...

Gearldine

1 months ago

I think C is the correct answer. It's all about translating MDF FO field labels.

upvoted 0 times

...

Penney

2 months ago

D sounds like the right choice to me. Translating both XML and MDF FO field labels would be a pretty comprehensive use case.

upvoted 0 times

Peter

1 months ago

Yes, D covers a wide range of field labels for translation in SAP SuccessFactors Employee Central.

upvoted 0 times

...

Lisha

1 months ago

D does seem like the most logical choice for translating both XML and MDF FO field labels.

upvoted 0 times

...

Izetta

1 months ago

I agree, it seems like the most comprehensive option for translating field labels.

upvoted 0 times

...

Roslyn

2 months ago

I think D is the correct choice as well. It covers both XML and MDF FO field labels.

upvoted 0 times

...

Keneth

2 months ago

I believe it's important to be able to translate both XML and MDF FO field labels for a more comprehensive localization.

upvoted 0 times

...

Bette

3 months ago

I agree with Krystina. It makes sense to have a tool for translating field labels in the instance.

upvoted 0 times

...

Krystina

3 months ago

I think the generic object foTranslation is used to translate any generic object field labels in the instance.

upvoted 0 times

...

Lonny

3 months ago

I think option B is the correct answer. Translating any generic object field labels in the instance seems like the most logical use for this tool.

upvoted 0 times

Ben

1 months ago

I'm not sure, but option C could also be correct since it specifically mentions translating MDF FO field labels.

upvoted 0 times

...

Ronnie

1 months ago

I think option A might also be a possibility, as it mentions translating XML and MDF FO field labels.

upvoted 0 times

...

Bernardine

2 months ago

I agree, option B does seem like the most logical choice.

upvoted 0 times

...

Ellen

2 months ago

True, option B does cover a broader range of generic object field labels in the instance.

upvoted 0 times

...

Dante

2 months ago

I think option A is more specific to translating XML and MDF FO field labels.

upvoted 0 times

...

Francene

2 months ago

But what about option A? Could that also be a possible use for the generic object foTranslation?

upvoted 0 times

...

Donette

2 months ago

I agree, option B does seem like the most logical choice.

upvoted 0 times

...