SAP Exam C_THR86_2311 Topic 1 Question 6 Discussion

Actual exam question for SAP's C_THR86_2311 exam

Question #: 6
Topic #: 1

Your client wishes to limit new employee salaries so that no employee can exceed 125% compa-ratio. They do not award lump sums. How can you configure the worksheet to meet this requirement?Note. There are 2 correct answers to this question.

ACreate a custom validation of type Error to ensure that the column curRatio is less than 125

BCreate a custom validation of type Error to ensure that the column compaRatio is less than 125

CCreate a standard vaBdation of type 'splitOrDisallov/' and action 'exceed' with the Threshold at 125

DCreate a standard validation of type 'disallow and action 'exceed with the Threshold at 125.

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: B, D

by Leota at Jan 24, 2024, 05:21 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium C_THR86_2311 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Chau

5 months ago

Ah, the joys of HR policies. Maybe we can sneak in a little raise under the table, just for fun. Wink wink.

upvoted 0 times

Tresa

4 months ago

B) Create a custom validation of type Error to ensure that the column compaRatio is less than 125

upvoted 0 times

...

Crissy

4 months ago

A) Create a custom validation of type Error to ensure that the column curRatio is less than 125

upvoted 0 times

...

Lajuana

5 months ago

Wait, what's a compa-ratio again? Guess I better brush up on my HR lingo before the exam.

upvoted 0 times

Ricarda

4 months ago

B) Create a custom validation of type Error to ensure that the column compaRatio is less than 125

upvoted 0 times

...

Cora

5 months ago

A) Create a custom validation of type Error to ensure that the column curRatio is less than 125

upvoted 0 times

...

Loren

5 months ago

D is the way to go, folks. Disallow that exceeding and keep it under 125%. Simple as that!

upvoted 0 times

Margart

5 months ago

Agreed, D is the way to go. Let's keep those new employee salaries in check.

upvoted 0 times

...

Lucina

5 months ago

D is definitely the correct choice. We need to disallow exceeding 125% compa-ratio.

upvoted 0 times

...

Alaine

5 months ago

Option A sounds good to me! Gotta love those custom validations. Keeps those salaries in line, am I right?

upvoted 0 times

...

Jarod

5 months ago

Hmm, looks like we need to watch out for those pesky compa-ratios. I'd go with option B and keep that compa-ratio in check.

upvoted 0 times

Joanna

4 months ago

Agreed, let's implement both options A and B to meet the client's requirement.

upvoted 0 times

...

Ollie

4 months ago

Sounds like a solid plan to me, covering all our bases with those validations.

upvoted 0 times

...

Dortha

4 months ago

Let's go with both options A and B to ensure no employee exceeds 125% compa-ratio.

upvoted 0 times

...

Shelia

4 months ago

True, having both options A and B would provide a double layer of protection.

upvoted 0 times

...

Gladys

5 months ago

I think option A is a good backup to make sure all bases are covered.

upvoted 0 times

...

Ardella

5 months ago

But wouldn't option A also work since it checks the curRatio column?

upvoted 0 times

...

Carey

5 months ago

I agree, option B seems like the best choice to keep compa-ratios in check.

upvoted 0 times

...