Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

SAP Exam C_THR86_2311 Topic 6 Question 18 Discussion

Actual exam question for SAP's C_THR86_2311 exam
Question #: 18
Topic #: 6
[All C_THR86_2311 Questions]

Your customer uses a look-up table to calculate custom budgets, as shown in the screenshot.

The budget is based on an employee s country and status In the template the country is defined with field ID customCountry and the status Is defined with field ID customStatus.What is the correct syntax to calculate the adjustment budget?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

Contribute your Thoughts:

Candra
3 months ago
I'm telling you, the answer is E. It's the only one that mentions 'adjustment', and we all know that's the key to a successful budget calculation, right? Unless, of course, the 'adjustment' is just a really fancy way of saying 'oops, we messed up the first time'.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leah
3 months ago
D, hands down. It's like the developers were on a coffee break when they came up with these other options. Classic case of 'keep it simple, stupid'.
upvoted 0 times
...
Eladia
3 months ago
Option A, for sure. Who needs all those fancy function names? toNumber and lookup are all you need, baby!
upvoted 0 times
Cecily
2 months ago
Yeah, Option A is definitely the best one. No need to overcomplicate things.
upvoted 0 times
...
Doug
2 months ago
I agree, Option A seems like the most logical choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
William
2 months ago
I think Option A is the way to go. Simple and straightforward.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Kristeen
3 months ago
Definitely C. Simple and straightforward, no unnecessary complexity. Just the way I like my syntax.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rosenda
3 months ago
I'm going with B. The syntax looks a bit funky, but I reckon it's the most comprehensive one. Plus, the field names match the screenshot.
upvoted 0 times
Antione
2 months ago
I agree with you, B seems to be the most comprehensive option based on the screenshot.
upvoted 0 times
...
Corinne
2 months ago
I'm not sure about B, I think C might be the correct syntax. It looks simpler and more straightforward.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kayleigh
2 months ago
I think B is the correct syntax too. It seems to match the field names in the screenshot.
upvoted 0 times
...
Elena
2 months ago
I agree with you, B seems to be the most comprehensive option based on the screenshot.
upvoted 0 times
...
Felicitas
3 months ago
I'm not sure about B, I think C might be the correct syntax. It looks simpler and more straightforward.
upvoted 0 times
...
Temeka
3 months ago
I think B is the correct syntax too. It seems to match the field names in the screenshot.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Tarra
3 months ago
Hmm, I think it's option E. The syntax looks correct to me, and it's the only one that mentions 'adjustment' in the lookup table.
upvoted 0 times
Mariann
3 months ago
Yes, I think so too. It mentions 'adjustment' which is crucial for calculating the budget.
upvoted 0 times
...
Fabiola
3 months ago
I agree, option E seems to be the right choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Stefan
3 months ago
I agree with Merilyn, option E seems to be the most accurate choice for calculating the adjustment budget.
upvoted 0 times
...
Merilyn
4 months ago
But option E includes adjustment which seems necessary for calculating the adjustment budget.
upvoted 0 times
...
Amira
4 months ago
I believe it's option C because it looks more straightforward.
upvoted 0 times
...
Merilyn
4 months ago
I think the correct syntax is option E.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77