Cyber Monday 2024! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

SAP Exam C_THR86_2405 Topic 4 Question 4 Discussion

Actual exam question for SAP's C_THR86_2405 exam
Question #: 4
Topic #: 4
[All C_THR86_2405 Questions]

Your customer has two pay components, with IDs SALARY_US and SALARY_UK. that are used for employees' base salary in their respective countries They want to plan for all employees on a single worksheet using the employees' periodic salary NOT the annual value.What is the best way to accomplish this?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D

Contribute your Thoughts:

Rocco
3 months ago
I'm with Theron on this one - if the customer wanted to manage two separate templates, they probably would have said so upfront!
upvoted 0 times
...
Wenona
3 months ago
Option A seems a bit clunky to me. Why introduce more custom columns when you can just use a pay component group?
upvoted 0 times
Mona
2 months ago
Option A may seem clunky, but it gives more flexibility in displaying the non-zero value
upvoted 0 times
...
Bev
2 months ago
C) Create a pay component group that includes both pay components and use that for the planning
upvoted 0 times
...
Annette
2 months ago
A) Create two custom columns and map each to the pay components Use a third custom column to display whichever is non zero
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Theron
3 months ago
Haha, I bet the customer is really hoping the answer isn't 'create two templates' - talk about a maintenance nightmare!
upvoted 0 times
...
Lauran
3 months ago
I'd go with Option D. Not mapping to specific pay component IDs gives you more flexibility down the line.
upvoted 0 times
Ira
2 months ago
I agree, Option D seems like the best choice for this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Galen
3 months ago
Option D is definitely the way to go. It gives you more flexibility for sure.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Sage
3 months ago
I think option D is the most efficient, setting the Used for Comp Planning flag and not mapping to a specific pay component ID.
upvoted 0 times
...
Meghann
3 months ago
Option C looks like the most straightforward approach. Combining the pay components into a single group simplifies the planning process.
upvoted 0 times
Alline
3 months ago
I agree, using a pay component group makes it easier to manage and track the salary components for employees in different countries.
upvoted 0 times
...
Yoko
3 months ago
Option C looks like the most straightforward approach. Combining the pay components into a single group simplifies the planning process.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Stefania
3 months ago
But wouldn't it be easier to just use a third custom column to display whichever is non zero?
upvoted 0 times
...
Velda
3 months ago
I disagree, I believe creating two custom columns and mapping each to the pay components is the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
Stefania
3 months ago
I think the best way is to create a pay component group that includes both pay components.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77