Cyber Monday 2024! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

SAP Exam C_THR86_2405 Topic 8 Question 5 Discussion

Actual exam question for SAP's C_THR86_2405 exam
Question #: 5
Topic #: 8
[All C_THR86_2405 Questions]

Your customer wants the guidelines for an employee's merit recommendation to be prorated based on the employee's date of last hire The date of last hire is different than the employee's original hire date.How can you fulfill this requirement?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

Contribute your Thoughts:

Ines
2 months ago
Honestly, I'm a little confused. All these options sound like they could work, but I'm not sure which one is the best. Maybe I should just flip a coin or ask the Magic 8-Ball. It would probably give me a more reliable answer than my brain at this point.
upvoted 0 times
Yuriko
1 months ago
D) Use raise proration and import the employee's last hire date in the RAISE_PRORATING_START_DATE column
upvoted 0 times
...
Garry
1 months ago
C) Use salary proration and set the review start date equal to the employee's last hire date
upvoted 0 times
...
Cristal
2 months ago
B) Use salary proration and import the employee's last hire date in the SALARY_PRORATING_START_DATE column.
upvoted 0 times
...
Melinda
2 months ago
A) Use raise proration and import a proration factor in the RAISE_PRORATING column
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Rickie
3 months ago
D is the way to go, no doubt. Raise proration and the RAISE_PRORATING_START_DATE column? That's the ticket, my friend. Plus, it has the word 'raise' in it, and who doesn't love a raise, am I right?
upvoted 0 times
...
Rolland
3 months ago
Hmm, I'm leaning towards option C. Setting the review start date equal to the employee's last hire date seems like a neat way to handle this. It's like a magic trick - poof, problem solved!
upvoted 0 times
Micaela
1 months ago
That could work too, but I still think option C is the most straightforward solution.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kristeen
2 months ago
Yeah, it's a straightforward solution to prorate based on the employee's last hire date.
upvoted 0 times
...
Evangelina
2 months ago
But what about using raise proration with the last hire date in the RAISE_PRORATING_START_DATE column?
upvoted 0 times
...
Roxane
2 months ago
I agree, setting the review start date to the last hire date makes sense.
upvoted 0 times
...
Armando
2 months ago
I agree, setting the review start date to the last hire date makes sense.
upvoted 0 times
...
Adolph
2 months ago
I think option C is a good choice too. It simplifies the process.
upvoted 0 times
...
Anglea
3 months ago
I think option C is a good choice. It simplifies the process.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Portia
3 months ago
I see both perspectives, but I personally think option C could also work by setting the review start date equal to the employee's last hire date. It seems like a straightforward solution.
upvoted 0 times
...
Virgina
3 months ago
That's a valid point, but I still think option A is more precise in terms of fulfilling the requirement for prorating based on the last hire date.
upvoted 0 times
...
Anissa
3 months ago
I think option B is the correct answer. Using salary proration and importing the employee's last hire date in the SALARY_PRORATING_START_DATE column seems like the most straightforward way to fulfill the requirement.
upvoted 0 times
Annalee
2 months ago
Yes, that makes sense. It's important to accurately prorate based on the employee's last hire date.
upvoted 0 times
...
Helaine
3 months ago
I agree, option B seems like the most logical choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Justa
3 months ago
I disagree, I believe option B is more appropriate as it suggests using salary proration and importing the employee's last hire date as the start date for proration.
upvoted 0 times
...
Virgina
4 months ago
I think option A is the best choice because it specifically mentions using raise proration and importing a proration factor based on the employee's last hire date.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77