SAP Exam C_THR86_2405 Topic 8 Question 5 Discussion

Actual exam question for SAP's C_THR86_2405 exam

Question #: 5
Topic #: 8

Your customer wants the guidelines for an employee's merit recommendation to be prorated based on the employee's date of last hire The date of last hire is different than the employee's original hire date.How can you fulfill this requirement?

AUse raise proration and import a proration factor in the RAISE_PRORATING column

BUse salary proration and import the employee s last hire date in the SALARY_PRORATING_START_DATE column.

CUse salary proration and set the review start date equal to the employees last hire date

DUse raise proration and import the employee s last hire date in the RA1SE_PRORATING_START_DATE column

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: C

by Vivienne at Aug 27, 2024, 03:38 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium C_THR86_2405 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Ines

28 days ago

Honestly, I'm a little confused. All these options sound like they could work, but I'm not sure which one is the best. Maybe I should just flip a coin or ask the Magic 8-Ball. It would probably give me a more reliable answer than my brain at this point.

upvoted 0 times

Cristal

3 days ago

B) Use salary proration and import the employee's last hire date in the SALARY_PRORATING_START_DATE column.

upvoted 0 times

...

Melinda

15 days ago

A) Use raise proration and import a proration factor in the RAISE_PRORATING column

upvoted 0 times

...

Rickie

1 months ago

D is the way to go, no doubt. Raise proration and the RAISE_PRORATING_START_DATE column? That's the ticket, my friend. Plus, it has the word 'raise' in it, and who doesn't love a raise, am I right?

upvoted 0 times

...

Rolland

1 months ago

Hmm, I'm leaning towards option C. Setting the review start date equal to the employee's last hire date seems like a neat way to handle this. It's like a magic trick - poof, problem solved!

upvoted 0 times

Kristeen

2 days ago

Yeah, it's a straightforward solution to prorate based on the employee's last hire date.

upvoted 0 times

...

Evangelina

8 days ago

But what about using raise proration with the last hire date in the RAISE_PRORATING_START_DATE column?

upvoted 0 times

...

Roxane

18 days ago

I agree, setting the review start date to the last hire date makes sense.

upvoted 0 times

...

Armando

19 days ago

I agree, setting the review start date to the last hire date makes sense.

upvoted 0 times

...

Adolph

24 days ago

I think option C is a good choice too. It simplifies the process.

upvoted 0 times

...

Anglea

30 days ago

I think option C is a good choice. It simplifies the process.

upvoted 0 times

...

Portia

1 months ago

I see both perspectives, but I personally think option C could also work by setting the review start date equal to the employee's last hire date. It seems like a straightforward solution.

upvoted 0 times

...

Virgina

1 months ago

That's a valid point, but I still think option A is more precise in terms of fulfilling the requirement for prorating based on the last hire date.

upvoted 0 times

...

Anissa

1 months ago

I think option B is the correct answer. Using salary proration and importing the employee's last hire date in the SALARY_PRORATING_START_DATE column seems like the most straightforward way to fulfill the requirement.

upvoted 0 times

Annalee

29 days ago

Yes, that makes sense. It's important to accurately prorate based on the employee's last hire date.

upvoted 0 times

...

Helaine

1 months ago

I agree, option B seems like the most logical choice.

upvoted 0 times

...

Justa

2 months ago

I disagree, I believe option B is more appropriate as it suggests using salary proration and importing the employee's last hire date as the start date for proration.

upvoted 0 times

...

Virgina

2 months ago

I think option A is the best choice because it specifically mentions using raise proration and importing a proration factor based on the employee's last hire date.

upvoted 0 times

...