Cyber Monday 2024! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

SAP Exam C_THR86_2405 Topic 8 Question 7 Discussion

Actual exam question for SAP's C_THR86_2405 exam
Question #: 7
Topic #: 8
[All C_THR86_2405 Questions]

How can the compRating field be used to enhance the compensation worksheet?Note There are 2 correct answers to this question.

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B, C

Contribute your Thoughts:

Veronica
2 months ago
As an accountant, I'm all about that option B. Gotta love a good old-fashioned rating scale change-up!
upvoted 0 times
...
Mindy
2 months ago
I think it allows a second rating field for guidelines. This can provide more detailed information for compensation decisions.
upvoted 0 times
...
Brock
2 months ago
I believe it allows ratings to be entered directly on the planning worksheet for employees without a performance form.
upvoted 0 times
...
Princess
2 months ago
Ooh, B and D for me. Different rating scales and a second field? This compRating thing is really stepping up the compensation game!
upvoted 0 times
Elke
1 months ago
Definitely, it really enhances the compensation worksheet.
upvoted 0 times
...
Danica
1 months ago
I think it's great that compRating allows for both of those options.
upvoted 0 times
...
Enola
2 months ago
Yeah, and having a second field for guidelines can help with more detailed evaluations.
upvoted 0 times
...
Quinn
2 months ago
I agree, having different rating scales can provide more flexibility.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
King
3 months ago
I'm going with A and D. A second rating field for guidelines? Sign me up! That sounds like it could really streamline the process.
upvoted 0 times
Lucy
2 months ago
Yeah, it would be helpful to have performance form rating overrides and a second rating field for guidelines.
upvoted 0 times
...
Royal
2 months ago
I agree, having a second rating field for guidelines could definitely streamline the process.
upvoted 0 times
...
Deeanna
2 months ago
I think A and D are the correct answers. It does sound like it could make things easier.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Erick
3 months ago
I agree with Malissa. It can also allow for performance ratings to use a different rating scale.
upvoted 0 times
...
Reena
3 months ago
C is an interesting choice, allowing ratings to be entered directly on the planning worksheet. That could be handy in certain situations.
upvoted 0 times
...
Eladia
3 months ago
A and B seem like the most logical options to me. The compRating field sounds like it provides some flexibility in the rating process.
upvoted 0 times
Artie
3 months ago
I agree, they seem like the most logical options.
upvoted 0 times
...
Celestina
3 months ago
I think A and B are correct.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Malissa
3 months ago
I think compRating field can be used for performance form rating overrides.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77