Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

SAP Exam C_THR89_2405 Topic 3 Question 2 Discussion

Actual exam question for SAP's C_THR89_2405 exam
Question #: 2
Topic #: 3
[All C_THR89_2405 Questions]

When filling out the Specification document, how do you identify a standard analysis option that is NOT applicable to

a customer?

Please choose the correct answer.

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

Contribute your Thoughts:

Barney
1 months ago
I think A is the best option, as it visually indicates that it is not applicable.
upvoted 0 times
...
Aleisha
1 months ago
But if you delete the row, how will you keep track of it?
upvoted 0 times
...
Sina
1 months ago
I disagree, I believe the correct answer is B.
upvoted 0 times
...
Aleisha
1 months ago
I think the correct answer is D.
upvoted 0 times
...
Arlean
2 months ago
Wait, we're filling out specification documents? Is that what they call 'bureaucracy' these days? *chuckles*
upvoted 0 times
...
Corinne
2 months ago
Option C is just moving the problem to the end of the list. Might as well just delete the row and be done with it. *mic drop*
upvoted 0 times
Wynell
30 days ago
B) Delete the row of the analysis option
upvoted 0 times
...
Tiffiny
1 months ago
A) Grey out the background of the row of the analysis option
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Jesusita
2 months ago
I think C is the best option, moving it to the end keeps things organized.
upvoted 0 times
...
Odelia
2 months ago
Option A is kind of a cop-out, don't you think? Greying out the background just hides the issue instead of dealing with it properly.
upvoted 0 times
Cornell
1 months ago
C) Move the row of the analysis option to the end of the analysis options section
upvoted 0 times
...
Daniel
2 months ago
B) Delete the row of the analysis option
upvoted 0 times
...
Dominque
2 months ago
A) Grey out the background of the row of the analysis option
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Zita
2 months ago
I agree with Yoko, modifying the source column makes sense.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ozell
3 months ago
I think Option D is the way to go. Modifying the source column to indicate it's not used keeps the document clean and organized.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gearldine
3 months ago
Option B seems like the most straightforward way to handle this. Just delete the row if it's not applicable - no need to clutter up the document.
upvoted 0 times
Lonna
2 months ago
C) Move the row of the analysis option to the end of the analysis options section
upvoted 0 times
...
Dick
2 months ago
B) Delete the row of the analysis option
upvoted 0 times
...
Rodrigo
2 months ago
A) Grey out the background of the row of the analysis option
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Sherrell
3 months ago
I disagree, I believe the answer is B.
upvoted 0 times
...
Yoko
3 months ago
I think the correct answer is D.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77