Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

SAP Exam C_THR96_2311 Topic 1 Question 12 Discussion

Actual exam question for SAP's C_THR96_2311 exam
Question #: 12
Topic #: 1
[All C_THR96_2311 Questions]

How does the Realize phase differ when implementing an SAP SuccessFactors Workforce Analytics on SAP HANA customer, compared to a traditional implementation? Note: There are 2 correct answers to this question.

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C, D

Contribute your Thoughts:

Ruby
4 months ago
Wow, this is a tough one. I'm going to go with C and D. Gotta love those HANA implementations, am I right? *winks*
upvoted 0 times
Dusti
3 months ago
D) The beta/alpha site is published early in the process.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dusti
4 months ago
C) Issues are addressed periodically throughout the implementation process.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Sophia
4 months ago
I'm going with B and C. Addressing issues after the beta is published and periodically throughout makes the most sense.
upvoted 0 times
Roosevelt
4 months ago
Definitely, it helps ensure that any issues are identified and resolved in a timely manner.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lizbeth
4 months ago
I agree, addressing issues at different stages of the implementation process is crucial for success.
upvoted 0 times
...
Aimee
4 months ago
I think B and C are the correct answers. It's important to address issues after the beta site is published and periodically throughout the process.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Jose
5 months ago
Agree, C and D seem correct because addressing issues periodically gives continuous feedback.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marla
5 months ago
So, option C?
upvoted 0 times
...
Onita
5 months ago
D sounds good to me. Publishing the beta site early makes sense for a HANA implementation.
upvoted 0 times
Freeman
4 months ago
Yes, D is correct. It's important to have the beta site published early in the process for SAP HANA implementation.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jospeh
4 months ago
D sounds good to me. Publishing the beta site early makes sense for a HANA implementation.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gene
4 months ago
User 2: I agree, having the beta site published early can help address issues sooner in the process.
upvoted 0 times
...
Aja
4 months ago
User 1: D sounds like the right choice. Publishing the beta site early is important for HANA implementation.
upvoted 0 times
...
Iluminada
4 months ago
User 3: Definitely, getting the beta site out early can help identify issues sooner.
upvoted 0 times
...
Fatima
4 months ago
User 2: Yes, I agree. It allows for early testing and feedback.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shelton
4 months ago
User 1: D sounds good to me. Publishing the beta site early makes sense for a HANA implementation.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Jaime
5 months ago
Yeah, makes sense. Issues being addressed periodically also sounds reasonable.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leanora
5 months ago
I think C is the correct answer. Issues should be addressed throughout the process, not just at the end.
upvoted 0 times
Josephine
4 months ago
User 2
upvoted 0 times
...
Dacia
4 months ago
User 1
upvoted 0 times
...
Viola
5 months ago
I agree, it's important to address issues as they come up to ensure a successful implementation.
upvoted 0 times
...
Viola
5 months ago
C is the correct answer. Issues should be addressed periodically throughout the implementation process.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Gearldine
5 months ago
For sure, the beta/alpha site is published early, so D is one answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Galen
6 months ago
I think the Realize phase question is tricky.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sherill
6 months ago
Anyone knows how to approach the SuccessFactors Workforce Analytics question?
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77